PI Original Ellyn Fortino Tuesday February 10th, 2015, 6:12pm

Executive Immigration Actions Could Boost IL Economy; Voters Oppose GOP Efforts Against Relief

President Barack Obama's recent immigration executive actions could greatly benefit Illinois' economy, according to new data. Meanwhile, the battle in Congress over Department of Homeland Security funding rages on as a new poll shows that most Illinoisans oppose GOP efforts, supported by U.S. Sen. Mark Kirk, to thwart the president's steps on immigration.

President Barack Obama's recent executive actions on immigration could mean a $3.8 billion to $9 billion boost to Illinois' gross domestic product over the next decade, according to the White House.

That growth translates into increased revenue for the state's budget, Cecilia Munoz, director of the White House Domestic Policy Council, told reporters on a Tuesday conference call focusing on the possible economic effects of Obama's new immigration policy in Illinois.

The numbers provided by Munoz are based on a recent report by Obama's Council of Economic Advisers, which examines the potential U.S. economic benefits of the administration's immigration executive orders. The orders were signed by the president back in November.

According to the CEA's analysis, the U.S. economy is estimated to grow by between $90 billion and $210 billion over the next decade thanks to the president's immigration plan, under which as many as five million undocumented immigrants could see temporary relief from deportation.

Specifically, qualified undocumented parents of children with U.S. legal status who have resided in the country since January 1, 2010 will be shielded from deportation for three years as part of the executive orders. Among other reforms, Obama's administrative relief extends deferred action to additional undocumented immigrants who came to the United States as children, but were too old to qualify for the 2012 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

To obtain deferred action and work permits as part of the president's plan, undocumented immigrants who have lived in the country for five years must pass a criminal background test and pay a fee. The application process for the expanded DACA program opens later this month. Those interested in applying for the deferred action for parents program can submit applications to the federal government starting in May.

U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) and U.S. Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL,4) joined Tuesday's White House conference call, which was held as a battle rages in Congress over the immigration orders and a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funding measure.

Last month, the GOP-led House passed a DHS funding bill that would block Obama's executive actions on immigration and end the DACA program. Since then, Republicans in the Senate have tried to take up a similar DHS funding measure with immigration riders, but their efforts have been quashed multiple times by Democrats.

If Congress does not pass a bill to fund DHS by February 27 -- when the department's current funding runs out -- some 30,000 workers, including many from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, would have to be furloughed, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson told CNN on Sunday.

As the DHS funding fight continues in Congress, Durbin told reporters on Tuesday's call that he has been on the Senate floor sharing the stories of those who would be negatively impacted by Republican proposals to "kill" the DACA program and Obama's executive actions.

"I won't go into the whole question about why they're using the appropriation for the Department of Homeland Security to wage this battle, but I will tell you that it's fundamentally wrong," Durbin stressed. "We are a nation of immigrants. Immigrants have built this country, and we could use the talents, the skills of these young people coming out of college and medical school to make this a better country and to make Illinois a stronger state."

Specifically, Durbin has been highlighting the stories of seven DACA recipients enrolled at Loyola University Chicago's Stritch School of Medicine.

"Their only condition of their going to medical school is they have to promise that for each year of medical school they will spend one year of their professional lives serving either in an inner city area or a ... rural state area that needs a doctor," Durbin told reporters. "They're willing to do it -- give up years of their lives in service of the state of Illinois. What we see from the Republicans is the effort to deport these medical students. These are DACA-protected medical students, and they want to eliminate any opportunity for them to renew their protected status and finish medical school.

"They're not thinking clearly, but the American people are," Durbin continued. "We want to have an immigration policy that is sensible, and the president has spelled out through executive order what the Republicans in the House of Representatives were refusing to do on their own. They can still call an immigration bill any day. I doubt that they will, but in the meantime, the president has done the right thing -- protecting tomorrow's DREAMers and providing an opportunity for their parents to stay and work here in the state of Illinois and in the United States."

Durbin was referring to the fact that Republican House leaders have refused to take up a bipartisan immigration reform package that cleared the Senate in June of 2013.

Gutierrez, who has spearheaded a cross-country tour educating the immigrant community about Obama's executive actions, said it is time for Republicans to stop pushing "these ugly, anti-immigrant" proposals and get serious about enacting a bipartisan overhaul of the nation's immigration system.

"You made your point," Gutierrez said of the Republicans. "Let's move forward now in helping our immigrant community and settling this issue."

Poll: Kirk's Opposition To Obama's Immigration Actions Could Hurt Him

Meanwhile, a new Public Policy Polling (PPP) survey shows that Illinoisans overwhelmingly support Obama's immigration executive orders and oppose Republican efforts to derail them through a DHS funding bill. As a result, U.S. Rep. Mark Kirk (R-IL), who is up for re-election next year, may see some backlash due to his votes in favor of proceeding with DHS funding legislation that would undo Obama's executive orders, according to the poll.

In the poll of 523 registered Illinois voters, 62 percent supported Obama's new immigration policy, while 30 percent opposed the plan. Of those polled, 51 percent expressed disproval over Republican efforts to roll back Obama's immigration reforms via a DHS funding bill, a tactic garnering support from just 38 percent of survey respondents.

In addition to Illinois, the poll explored voter attitudes on the same issues in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. These four states all have "vulnerable" Republican incumbent Senators up for re-election in 2016, including Kirk as well as U.S. Sens. Ron Johnson (R-WI), Rob Portman (R-OH) and Pat Toomey (R-PA).

"All four of these Senators have approval numbers that make them pretty vulnerable for re-election next year," PPP Director Tom Jensen said on a separate conference call Tuesday announcing the survey results. "What we find about all four of them is that their approval ratings (are) in the 30s ... About [a] third of voters approve of them, about a third of voters disapprove of them and about a third of voters don't have an opinion about them one way or the other.

"And what that means is because they're undefined to a lot of voters at this point, they're really going to be defined by how they act over the next two years," he added. "And what we're finding is that on this immigration and homeland security issue, voters are not very happy with them."

Jensen noted that the majority of Independent voters polled in each of the four states backed Obama's immigration orders.

"These are all states that voted Democratic for president in both 2008 and 2012, so they're states, where for these Republican senators to get re-elected next year, they're really going to have to do well with Independent voters," he said. "And what we're finding is that a majority of Independent voters in each of these states support the new immigration policy, so it really puts these Republican senators at odds with one of the key groups they're going to need to have behind them in order to get re-elected next year."

By a 22 point margin, Illinoisans who were polled reported to be less likely to support Kirk in the next election as a result of the senator "voting to overturn the new immigration policy." Of those polled, 47 percent said Kirk's opposition to Obama's immigration orders makes them less likely to support the senator in the future, while 25 percent think they would be more likely to support him. Twenty-five percent of respondents said Kirk's position on the matter makes no difference on whether they would support him in 2016, while 3 percent said they were not sure.

When asked, "Does refusing to fund the Department of Homeland Security unless the immigration policy change is blocked make you more or less likely to vote for Mark Kirk next year, or does it not make a difference," 47 percent of poll respondents said "less likely," 30 percent said "more likely," 20 percent said it "doesn't make a difference," while 5 percent were undecided.

Kirk's general approval and disapproval ratings are both at 34 percent, according to the survey, which was conducted on behalf of SEIU* and the Alliance for Citizenship. Thirty-three percent of respondents were not sure whether they approve or disapprove of Kirk's job performance.

"We are very disappointed that Sen. Kirk has in effect voted to deny immigration relief to hundreds of thousands of Illinois immigrants," Lawrence Benito, CEO of the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, said in a statement. "Rather than standing with Illinois voters and immigrant families, he has chosen to play politics with DHS funding and immigrant lives. We hope these polling results will show him that he needs to change course."

The Illinois-based poll, conducted February 5 through February 6, has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.3 percent.

The release of the polling results coincided with SEIU's launch of a digital ad campaign taking aim at each of the four Republican senators to let them know that "homeland security is no place for games" and that they need to "put people over politics," said Rocio Saenz, SEIU's international executive vice president.

*The SEIU Illinois Council sponsors this website.

Comments

Has the GOP Establishment been misleading the American Public, as after all the hierarchy is the proverbial puppets of the US Chamber of Commerce and the wealthy suppliers of money? IS THERE EVEN SOME UNDERHAND DEAL BETWEEN THE TWO POLITICAL PARTIES? America's only hope is the TEA PARTY and the physical Conservative movement away from major party members. A reckoning of the dollar statistics from expenditures for illegal aliens, welfare, healthcare, child tax credits and remittances for illegal work sent outside the United States and a lot of freebies and inducements ranging in the hundreds of billions--Yes! dollars? There are even more millions illegal aliens waiting outside our border, ready to steal into our country. Cheap labor arranged to take your jobs. And this is a fact. It's already begun? Reported and alleged that recent Southern California Edison layoffs of some 400 IT staff employees may have been motivated by the company's desire to replace them. It was a program to simply replace American workers en masse with cheap labor. They even had to train the new recruits, which essentially is disgusting. Genevieve Wood advances policy priorities of The Heritage Foundation as senior contributor to The Daily Signal wrote this column; Are Senate Republicans caving? House Republicans successfully passed a bill that funds the Department of Homeland Security, but ensures President Obama's amnesty, engineered in an executive action in November, won't be funded. Senate Republicans have tried three times to bring the bill up for consideration and yes, each time Senate Democrats have filibustered and not allowed the bill to come the floor. But now Senate Republicans appear to be giving up. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said Tuesday, "The next move obviously is up to the House." Unfortunately, the only thing "obvious" here is that Senate Republicans don't appear committed to the fight. The legislative tactics used by Democrats aren't exactly surprising. Did McConnell and team not expect them? Why haven't they developed a "Plan B" instead of suggesting the House, which has already passed the bill, should come up with one? Republicans are, after all, the majority party in the Senate holding 54 seats, which is just six shy of the 60 needed to break the filibuster. And shouldn't the pressure be on Democrats, not on House Republicans? At least seven Senate Democrats have made public statements in the past three months questioning Obama's executive amnesty actions. Every public opinion poll shows the majority of Americans are opposed to them as well. Think about this: By refusing to pass the House DHS funding bill, Democrats are literally taking the position that Social Security cards for illegal immigrants are more important than paychecks for border patrol agents. Republicans can't win that fight? Give me a break. If the GOP played tougher they might be able to force some Democrats to break ranks. But instead, McConnell tells us that the Senate is "stuck" and they are wiping their hands of it and tossing the political football back to the House. That is simply unacceptable. Conservative voters who put many Republicans in office are rightly expecting more. Does anyone recall hearing a single Republican candidate running for office last fall saying they would only be willing to fight the good fight against Obama's executive amnesty actions if they had 60 votes in the Senate? No one, including those now in Senate leadership, ever expected to have 60 seats and yet they promised time and again they would do battle if given the majority. The very way Republicans won a majority last fall, by making their case to the American public, is exactly the same strategy they should be taking up now on the DHS bill. Yet Republicans have allowed this battle to be fought out in the backrooms of Congress - out of sight of all except the most engaged politico. It's two weeks before funding runs out for DHS and members of Congress will be at home all of next week for the President's Day holiday. With the funding deadline looming and the ability of members to hold town halls and talk to their constituents directly, not through the Washington press corps, what better timing than now to get the public engaged? McConnell and other GOP leaders should stop holding press events outside their Senate conference rooms and take this battle to the public square. Obama's runs around the Constitution are a serious matter and they deserve the most serious of efforts by those we elected to stop him. It is time for Republicans to put an end to the destruction on American families that Obama's cheap labor policy national impact or obama's call for voters, legal and unlawful. We urge you to call your Representative and Senators (the Capitol Switchboard is 1-866-220-0044) and demand that they vote to defund Obama's unconstitutional executive amnesty and protect American jobs for American workers. Are you ready to help us stop him and end amnesty for illegal aliens once and for all--before the true and final destruction begins? You the American people, have ALL the power of your vote.

I truly cherished perusing your web journal. It was exceptionally all around composed and simple to undertand. Not at all like extra sites I have perused which are truly not tht great. I likewise discovered your posts exceptionally fascinating. Indeed subsequent to understanding, I needed to go demonstrat to it to my companion and he ejoyed it too! high PR backlinks services

I am trusting the same best exertion from you later on also. Truth be told your experimental writing abilities has propelled me. instagram follower
likes for likes instagram

This is such an incredible asset, to the point that you are giving and you give it away for nothing. I cherish seeing blog that comprehend the quality. Im happy to have discovered this post as its such a fascinating one! I am dependably vigilant for quality posts and articles so i assume im fortunate to have discovered this! I trust you will be including more later on... minecraft free
free netflix account

Comments

Log in or register to post comments