In what will certainly become a controversial decision, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Washington D.C.'s ban on handguns this morning, declaring for the first time that the Constitution protects an individual’s right to possess a gun, not just the right of the states to maintain militias:
Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority in the landmark 5-to-4 decision, said the Constitution does not allow “the absolute prohibition of handguns held and used for self-defense in the home.” In so declaring, the majority found that a gun-control law in the nation’s capital went too far in making it nearly impossible to own a handgun.
But the court held that the individual right to possess a gun “for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home” is not unlimited. “It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose,” Justice Scalia wrote.
The decision is the first since 1939 to deal with the scope of the Second Amendment. In his dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote that the majority “would have us believe that over 200 years ago, the framers made a choice to limit the tools available to elected officials wishing to regulate civilian uses of weapons.”
So how will this affect Chicago's gun-control laws, which were similar to DC's and have been in place since 1982?







