Progress Illinois

The Windy City edition of the New York Times debuted today, featuring an article on the controversial parking meter lease from veteran City Hall reporter Dan Mihalopoulos, now with the Chicago News Cooperative.

In his report, Mihalopoulos digs into the books of Chicago Parking Meters LLC, the private company that now controls the city's meters under a 75-year, $1.15 billion deal with the city. He found -- not surprisingly -- that the company's profits are growing steadily, generating $1.1 million per week, thanks to the higher rates they instituted after taking over the system.  With more gradual increases on the way, the company is projected to collect $46.9 million this year and $79.5 million in 2010.

The most candid remark in Mihalopoulos' piece came from Ald. Rey Colon (35th Ward), who was one of five aldermen to vote against the 2008 ordinance approving the parking meter deal:

Another of the naysayers on the Council, Rey Colon, said this week that the parking meter company’s own numbers showed that aldermen should have raised parking charges and kept the money that the increases would have generated.

“At this rate, it was a great deal for the parking meter company,” he said. “I don’t know if it was a good deal for the city. We should have just bit the bullet and done it ourselves.”

Mayor Daley and some of the aldermen who supported the deal like to make the argument that the city could not have "bit the bullet and done it ourselves" for political reasons.  They further argue that their chosen path -- offloading the responsibility for the system to a private company (who then raises the rates) in return for an immediate windfall -- was a safer approach.  But was it? 

Continue reading »

That's how the Reader's Ben Joravsky describes our own Angela Caputo in his latest article on Chicago's tax increment financing (TIF) network.  And you can bet she's wearing that badge with pride.

Joravasky's piece also details how state legislators used a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) bill to quietly extend the lifespan of four Chicago TIF districts by 12 years.  With little to no debate, the bill was passed by both chambers in the final days of the regular session and signed by the governor in late August.  Joravsky later notes that the projects to be subsidized by these districts during the extended period appear worthwhile, at least when compared with "some of the stuff the mayor comes up with, such as the recent $35 million handout to United Airlines."  But the process of approving the extension should nonetheless raise eyebrows:

You'd hope that in these calamitous economic times, Governor Quinn, house speaker Michael Madigan, and senate president John Cullerton would feel compelled to hold hearings and engage in debate before effectively raising Chicagoans' property taxes. But you'd hope in vain.

Joravsky further writes about Cook County Clerk David Orr's new TIF search engine and gives some great instructions on how to research the amount of individual property taxes that go into Daley's slush fund. Read the whole thing here.

The Chicago City Council held its full monthly meeting yesterday.  We've got some of the highlights:

Budget Priorities Take A Beating

All eyes have been on Mayor Daley's 2010 spending plan as of late, which relies on $370 million from the city's asset-sale proceeds to help balance next year's $6.14 billion budget. Despite this windfall, the safety net is still going to take a hit.  During the public portion of yesterday's meeting, several social service providers testified in favor of restoring the cuts to substance abuse and mental health funding. As regular readers may recall, the city's 12 mental health clinics will lose an additional $3 million in state funding this year because of the Daley administration's own incompetence at implementing a new $16 million billing system.

In response, Ald. Joe Moore (49th Ward) voiced support for rescinding the cuts and blasted Daley's "property tax relief" gimmick -- a plan introduced yesterday to pull $35 million from a reserve fund created by the parking meter lease to refund some taxpayers between $50 and $100 on their bills. "What impact is that going to have on those homeowners lives? It's very negligible," Moore said. "I think you're going to get a lot more bang for your buck by helping the mentally ill lead productive lives through counseling and other support services."  Listen:

Internal mp3

Ald. Moore isn't the only one slamming Daley's meager property tax rebate.

Continue reading »

Mayor Daley appears to be feeling the pressure to come clean about his plans to spend the city's $1 billion tax increment financing (TIF) surplus.  As regular readers know, the city's unprecedented budget shortfall has opened the door to some long-overdue questions about why the public funds ($495 million in 2009 to be exact) siphoned off the tax rolls each year aren't folded into the public budgeting process. On Friday, Daley went on the offense, citing a recently-renovated bridge as an example of how the TIF system isn't shadowy at all, but rather an expansive public works campaign that's unfolding in plain sight. From the Tribune's report:

Aldermen who want greater control over how tax increment financing funds are used in their wards are "beating the heck out of us" without appreciating how the money has improved their neighborhoods, Daley said at an event to mark repairs on the Cherry Avenue bridge connecting North Avenue to Goose Island. The bridge renovation was funded in part using $3.75 million collected from a special taxing district in the area, where property tax collections were frozen to help finance infrastructure repairs [...]

"Some of the aldermen are questioning it. That's why they're not here today, to be very simple. Because they don't think it should be used for this purpose," Daley said.

For the past year, we've been following the TIF debate very closely and have yet to hear an alderman protest the use of the funds on a public works project. What's come under fire is the fact that the money is being doled out in secret -- and often in the form of corporate welfare --  at a time when public services have been slashed and property owners taxed to the hilt.

Moreover, most aldermen probably aren't so fond of how the mayor uses his control of the TIF honey pot to keep them in line.

Continue reading »

Each fall, Cook County Clerk David Orr releases an annual tally of how much public money has been absorbed into Chicago's massive tax increment financing (TIF) system. Like clockwork, each new report reveals that hundreds of millions are whisked away from schools, parks, libraries, and other taxing bodies. The exact amount each taxpayers kicks into Mayor Daley's "glorified slush fund" has remained elusive, however, as now-Congressman Mike Quigley wrote in a Progress Illinois column last year:

The single worst aspect of the TIF system in Cook County is that taxpayers residing in the districts have no idea how much of their tax payments end up in TIF accounts. Indeed, while TIF is listed on every bill alongside the agencies receiving property taxes, the line always reads $0.00. This is due to a quirk in the way the County Clerk has historically calculated tax rates. But as a consequence, the taxpaying public is misinformed.

That changed yesterday, when Orr took a major step towards unlocking that part of the TIF mystery. Along with his tally for 2008, the Clerk's office has unveiled an online search engine that allows those who reside in TIF districts to find out (using their permanent index number) how much of their tax bill is being siphoned away.

For fun, we plugged in Mayor Daley's PIN number (17-22-109-027-0000) and found that a whopping 92 percent of his property taxes were redirected into the Near South TIF last year. By contrast, cash-strapped schools are getting a mere 3.9 percent of the Daley's property tax dollars. This goes to show how much strain the TIF system are putting on those local taxing bodies entrusted to deliver education and other public services.

Continue reading »

With less than a week to go before the Chicago Board of Education votes on whether or not to authorize six new charter schools, Chicago Public Schools (CPS) held a round of public hearings last night. School reform advocates have long complained that CPS handpicks which charters will get the green light long before the hearings begin. And the opaque nature of the process generated a lot of criticism last year.  As a result, officials are treading more lightly as they move forward this year.

Unlike in the previous years of Mayor Daley's Renaissance 2010 program, only a handful of new charters are being considered this time around. Still, CPS chief Ron Huberman is recommending that an additional 8,130 charters seats be made available next fall, according to an analysis by the Caucus of Rank and File Educators (CORE). Alexander Russo reports that the established private school operators appear to have a leg-up:

Just six new schools are being recommended for approval -- most of them add-on campuses of existing networks.  Fourteen did a full application only to get rejected.  Meanwhile, a slew of existing contract schools are vying for charterization thanks to the newly lifted charter cap.

Contract schools -- which are also privately-managed but allow teachers to join collective bargaining under the Chicago Teacher's Union -- began to spring up when CPS nears the cap on the charter schools (originally set at 30). Regular readers may recall that the General Assembly agreed to lift that cap last spring, effectively allowing the number of Chicago charters to double.

Continue reading »

Since the Reader's Ben Joravsky and Mick Dumke published their latest report on Chicago's shady tax increment financing (TIF) system, we've noted the increasing media attention being devoted to the issue, with some reporters even going so far as to refer to as a "huge problem" for the city. Today, as the city budget hearings wind on, the Tribune editorial board does its part to keep the story alive in a piece titled, "It's Our Money."  The board takes that reasonable (and familiar) position that, while TIF can be a valuable and effective economic development tool, Mayor Daley's use of it has gotten out of hand:

TIFs are meant to revitalize blighted areas that wouldn't otherwise be attractive to developers. By designating an area a TIF district, the city lays claim to the new tax dollars generated by rising property values there. Those dollars are supposed to be reinvested in the district to promote growth.

TIFs are one of the better redevelopment tools available to local governments. But Chicago has gotten carried away, creating a vast redevelopment wonderland controlled by the mayor. More than a third of the city, including the LaSalle financial district and most of the Loop, now falls within TIF districts. Though it stands to reason that an area that raises hundreds of millions of dollars in property taxes is no longer blighted, if it ever was, the Daley administration insists the TIFs are needed to keep those skyscrapers from falling into disrepair.

The board goes on to call for more transparency: "Open the books, Mayor. Put everything out in the open so taxpayers can see how their dollars are spent."  

It's great to see more and more voices in the local media speak up about the TIF "mission creep." A more transparent system is obviously needed.  But we should also recognize that there are ways to scale back the system and lessen its drag on local taxing bodies.  Learn more about them here.

This past spring, a new $16 million system implemented by the Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH) turned out to be so flawed that patient mental health bills weren’t submitted to the state for six months in 2008. This so-called "glitch" led to a loss of more than $1million in state funding and almost resulted in the closure down four clinics on the city's South Side.  Back in July we took Daley administration officials at their word when they said that the problems were fixed.

Big mistake.

During the ongoing city budget hearings yesterday, it was revealed that the system is still not working properly. Outgoing CDPH chief Terry Mason told aldermen that fixing the $16 million Cerner system -- which was supposed to represent an upgrade -- remains "an active process."

To his credit, Ald. Rick Munoz (22nd Ward) pressed him on the matter: "You're saying that after 18 months you're unable to work out technical glitches that prevent us from billing the state?" "That is correct," Mason responded.

Budget Committee Chair Ald. Carrie Austin (34th Ward) assured Munoz that the Cerner system would be fixed within "months."

"Months?" Munoz asked.  Austin replied that she couldn't offer a "specific date."

Continue reading »

With his public opinion at an all-time low and questions circling about his "creative" city financing, Chicago Mayor Richard Daley is making the media rounds -- sitting down with both WLS' Bill Cameron and WBEZ's Eight Forty-Eight in recent days. Not surprisingly, Daley is trying to blunt criticism that his shadowy tax increment financing (TIF) system has become a major drag on the city's finances, contributing to this year's historic $520 million shortfall. Instead of coming clean on the public funds that he's skimmed off the tax rolls, Daley is making more bogus claims to divert attention from his "glorified slush fund." Here's some excerpts from his conversation with WBEZ's Allison Cuddy, along with our responses:

DALEY: Most TIF funds don't generate any money. Most TIF funds are used for schools, parks, libraries, ex-offender programs, job training, economic development to keep jobs here. And I'll go over each TIF to show you that.

CUDDY: But you generate about a half-a billion in TIF funds per year.

DALEY: Not quite. No, I don't think so.

CUDDY: And you have about a billion in cash.

DALEY: No I don't think so. I don't think it's that high. Most of it's pledged already for a school, a park, a library. Most of it's pledged for economic development in depressed areas to bring back jobs or to keep jobs there.

The mayor doesn't "think" that his TIF network siphons off around a half-million dollars per year?  In 2008 alone, the TIF system siphoned $552 million off the tax rolls, based on annual reports signed by Daley himself. Cook County Clerk David Orr also tracks the numbers and reports that $555 million was diverted in 2007.

And what about the surplus Cuddy cites?

Continue reading »

This week property tax bills hit mailboxes across Cook County and many property owners were justifiably outraged by their skyrocketing rates. Elected officials all tried to dodge responsibility for their role, including Mayor Daley, who certainly deserves his fair share of criticism (after all, his extensive tax increment financing system deprived local taking bodies of $552 million last year alone.) The mayor tried unsuccessfully to pass the buck to Assessor Jim Houlihan. Houlihan, in turn, pointed to House Speaker Michael Madigan (D-Chicago) for opposing an extension of the 7 percent tax cap, which sunset this year. But it's the SouthownStar's Phil Kadner who hits the nail on the head, noting that the state's regressive tax policy is the real culprit:

All Daley has to do to lower property tax bills in Chicago is to tell the school board (which he controls) to cut the school system's levy in half. He's not going to do that, of course [...]

Why hasn't that happened?

Because new tax money would have to be generated to replace the lost money from the property tax. The Legislature would have to increase the income tax, the state sales tax and maybe both.

Some folks would say that makes for a fairer system because those taxes are based on income, the amount of money people earn and on how much they spend.

Continue reading »