Progress Illinois

That's how the Reader's Ben Joravsky describes our own Angela Caputo in his latest article on Chicago's tax increment financing (TIF) network.  And you can bet she's wearing that badge with pride.

Joravasky's piece also details how state legislators used a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) bill to quietly extend the lifespan of four Chicago TIF districts by 12 years.  With little to no debate, the bill was passed by both chambers in the final days of the regular session and signed by the governor in late August.  Joravsky later notes that the projects to be subsidized by these districts during the extended period appear worthwhile, at least when compared with "some of the stuff the mayor comes up with, such as the recent $35 million handout to United Airlines."  But the process of approving the extension should nonetheless raise eyebrows:

You'd hope that in these calamitous economic times, Governor Quinn, house speaker Michael Madigan, and senate president John Cullerton would feel compelled to hold hearings and engage in debate before effectively raising Chicagoans' property taxes. But you'd hope in vain.

Joravsky further writes about Cook County Clerk David Orr's new TIF search engine and gives some great instructions on how to research the amount of individual property taxes that go into Daley's slush fund. Read the whole thing here.

A Chicago alderman objecting to the creation of a new tax increment financing (TIF) district in his ward? 

It's not something you hear about every day.  But Brendan Reilly (42nd Ward) is reportedly pushing back against some East Loop property owners who want to see their area -- in the heart of downtown -- become eligible for TIF subsidies.  From Crain's Real Estate Daily:

“Owner reinvestment and market forces should ultimately decide ‘winners’ and ‘losers,’ not TIF subsidies,” Mr. Reilly said in a release. “The East Loop TIF proposal appears to provide a competitive advantage to those properties within the proposed TIF boundary. The intent of TIF was never to place surrounding properties (directly outside of the district, of similar age and class) at a leasing disadvantage. This proposal would very likely have exactly that effect.” [....]

“I do not agree that the needs within the proposed boundary come close to meeting the threshold level of obsolescence or deterioration the Illinois statute was designed to address,” Mr. Reilly wrote in a latter to Matthew Amato, a Jones Lang LaSalle Inc. executive who is general manager of the Aon Center. 

As we've repeatedly noted, while TIF was originally devised as an economic development tool for blighted neighborhoods, Mayor Daley has consistently overlooked that original purpose in order to create new TIF districts in affluent areas and throughout Chicago’s downtown.  The TIF network -- whose subsidies he directly controls -- now comprises nearly a third of the city's surface area and, on average, redirects $500 million away from local taxing bodies each year.  Moreover, Daley's unilateral ability to approve projects within the individual districts gives him massive power over individual alderman.

Kudos to Ald. Reilly for recognizing that more downtown TIF districts is not what this city needs.

A few months back, a coalition of community activists from across Chicago met at City Hall to call out the Daley administration for investing so few tax increment financing (TIF) dollars in affordable housing. After all, over the past decade, a mere 4 percent of the economic development money has gone towards such projects. That's despite the fact that home construction and the stabilization of housing stock can be key drivers in the rejuvenation of blighted communities. But instead of using substantial amounts of the money for these purposes, regular readers know that Mayor Daley has more often played favorites and doled out money to deep-pocketed corporations to subsidize their swank office renovations.

With the Sweet Home Chicago coalition at their back, Alds. Walter Burnett (27th Ward) and Manny Flores (1st Ward) have taken the lead in proposing that a larger chunk of the money -- 20 percent of TIF revenue collected each year -- is committed to affordable housing projects.  These new and rehabbed developments would address the city's housing imbalance by setting aside apartments for low- and moderate-income families (earning $37,700 a year or less) who are priced out of decent housing in a growing number of Chicago communities.

Yesterday, the coalition of community groups gathered in in Uptown where they highlighted some of the blighted buildings that could benefit from greater TIF investment. "We need this housing," neighborhood housing activist Laverne Johnson said, pointing to her neighbors' sub-standard living conditions. "We are all suffering." Watch:

So far, five aldermen have signed on to the ordinance. Once it has 15 supporters, the measure will go to the full City Council. The Sweet Home Chicago organizers are working on drumming up more support in wards throughout the city. "Until you have pressure from the outside," co-sponsor Ald. Joe Moore (49th Ward) tells us, "the conversation won't happen."

Mayor Daley appears to be feeling the pressure to come clean about his plans to spend the city's $1 billion tax increment financing (TIF) surplus.  As regular readers know, the city's unprecedented budget shortfall has opened the door to some long-overdue questions about why the public funds ($495 million in 2009 to be exact) siphoned off the tax rolls each year aren't folded into the public budgeting process. On Friday, Daley went on the offense, citing a recently-renovated bridge as an example of how the TIF system isn't shadowy at all, but rather an expansive public works campaign that's unfolding in plain sight. From the Tribune's report:

Aldermen who want greater control over how tax increment financing funds are used in their wards are "beating the heck out of us" without appreciating how the money has improved their neighborhoods, Daley said at an event to mark repairs on the Cherry Avenue bridge connecting North Avenue to Goose Island. The bridge renovation was funded in part using $3.75 million collected from a special taxing district in the area, where property tax collections were frozen to help finance infrastructure repairs [...]

"Some of the aldermen are questioning it. That's why they're not here today, to be very simple. Because they don't think it should be used for this purpose," Daley said.

For the past year, we've been following the TIF debate very closely and have yet to hear an alderman protest the use of the funds on a public works project. What's come under fire is the fact that the money is being doled out in secret -- and often in the form of corporate welfare --  at a time when public services have been slashed and property owners taxed to the hilt.

Moreover, most aldermen probably aren't so fond of how the mayor uses his control of the TIF honey pot to keep them in line.

Continue reading »

Each fall, Cook County Clerk David Orr releases an annual tally of how much public money has been absorbed into Chicago's massive tax increment financing (TIF) system. Like clockwork, each new report reveals that hundreds of millions are whisked away from schools, parks, libraries, and other taxing bodies. The exact amount each taxpayers kicks into Mayor Daley's "glorified slush fund" has remained elusive, however, as now-Congressman Mike Quigley wrote in a Progress Illinois column last year:

The single worst aspect of the TIF system in Cook County is that taxpayers residing in the districts have no idea how much of their tax payments end up in TIF accounts. Indeed, while TIF is listed on every bill alongside the agencies receiving property taxes, the line always reads $0.00. This is due to a quirk in the way the County Clerk has historically calculated tax rates. But as a consequence, the taxpaying public is misinformed.

That changed yesterday, when Orr took a major step towards unlocking that part of the TIF mystery. Along with his tally for 2008, the Clerk's office has unveiled an online search engine that allows those who reside in TIF districts to find out (using their permanent index number) how much of their tax bill is being siphoned away.

For fun, we plugged in Mayor Daley's PIN number (17-22-109-027-0000) and found that a whopping 92 percent of his property taxes were redirected into the Near South TIF last year. By contrast, cash-strapped schools are getting a mere 3.9 percent of the Daley's property tax dollars. This goes to show how much strain the TIF system are putting on those local taxing bodies entrusted to deliver education and other public services.

Continue reading »

Since the Reader's Ben Joravsky and Mick Dumke published their latest report on Chicago's shady tax increment financing (TIF) system, we've noted the increasing media attention being devoted to the issue, with some reporters even going so far as to refer to as a "huge problem" for the city. Today, as the city budget hearings wind on, the Tribune editorial board does its part to keep the story alive in a piece titled, "It's Our Money."  The board takes that reasonable (and familiar) position that, while TIF can be a valuable and effective economic development tool, Mayor Daley's use of it has gotten out of hand:

TIFs are meant to revitalize blighted areas that wouldn't otherwise be attractive to developers. By designating an area a TIF district, the city lays claim to the new tax dollars generated by rising property values there. Those dollars are supposed to be reinvested in the district to promote growth.

TIFs are one of the better redevelopment tools available to local governments. But Chicago has gotten carried away, creating a vast redevelopment wonderland controlled by the mayor. More than a third of the city, including the LaSalle financial district and most of the Loop, now falls within TIF districts. Though it stands to reason that an area that raises hundreds of millions of dollars in property taxes is no longer blighted, if it ever was, the Daley administration insists the TIFs are needed to keep those skyscrapers from falling into disrepair.

The board goes on to call for more transparency: "Open the books, Mayor. Put everything out in the open so taxpayers can see how their dollars are spent."  

It's great to see more and more voices in the local media speak up about the TIF "mission creep." A more transparent system is obviously needed.  But we should also recognize that there are ways to scale back the system and lessen its drag on local taxing bodies.  Learn more about them here.

With his public opinion at an all-time low and questions circling about his "creative" city financing, Chicago Mayor Richard Daley is making the media rounds -- sitting down with both WLS' Bill Cameron and WBEZ's Eight Forty-Eight in recent days. Not surprisingly, Daley is trying to blunt criticism that his shadowy tax increment financing (TIF) system has become a major drag on the city's finances, contributing to this year's historic $520 million shortfall. Instead of coming clean on the public funds that he's skimmed off the tax rolls, Daley is making more bogus claims to divert attention from his "glorified slush fund." Here's some excerpts from his conversation with WBEZ's Allison Cuddy, along with our responses:

DALEY: Most TIF funds don't generate any money. Most TIF funds are used for schools, parks, libraries, ex-offender programs, job training, economic development to keep jobs here. And I'll go over each TIF to show you that.

CUDDY: But you generate about a half-a billion in TIF funds per year.

DALEY: Not quite. No, I don't think so.

CUDDY: And you have about a billion in cash.

DALEY: No I don't think so. I don't think it's that high. Most of it's pledged already for a school, a park, a library. Most of it's pledged for economic development in depressed areas to bring back jobs or to keep jobs there.

The mayor doesn't "think" that his TIF network siphons off around a half-million dollars per year?  In 2008 alone, the TIF system siphoned $552 million off the tax rolls, based on annual reports signed by Daley himself. Cook County Clerk David Orr also tracks the numbers and reports that $555 million was diverted in 2007.

And what about the surplus Cuddy cites?

Continue reading »

Is Northwest Side Ald. Tom Allen (38th Ward) emerging as the Chicago City Council's leading tax increment financing (TIF) watchdog? Since Mayor Daley began to detail just how bad the city's finances have become, Allen has been one of the most vocal critics of the mayor's decision not to crack open his $1 billion "piggy bank" to ease the financial crisis. The Sun-Times' Fran Spielman caught his latest remarks during a budget hearing yesterday:

It was opening day of City Council budget hearings, and Chicago aldermen were loaded for bear [...]

They railed about the mayor’s plan to spend all but $730 million of the combined, $3 billion in Chicago Skyway and parking meter proceeds while allowing tax-increment-financing (TIF) districts to siphon $540 million-a-year away from the city’s property tax base.

“We should re-name it the ‘Over-tax fund’ — OTF. How can we with a straight face tell the citizens of Chicago that, ‘We have $1.1 billion of your money stuffed under our mattress, but don’t worry. We’re gonna give you $35 million in [property tax] relief?’ ’’ said Ald. Tom Allen (38th).

City officials have tried to quash the suggestion; for instance, CBS 2 reported their response this week that TIF funds are off limits and can't be tapped for general operating expenses. Perhaps if more local reporters understood how TIF districts operate, they wouldn't be so quick to take the bait.

Continue reading »

Last week, we documented how the Reader's stellar investigation into Mayor Daley's $1 billion "shadow budget" had reinvigorated the public debate around tax increment financing (TIF) -- just in time for the city's budget talks with aldermen.  Over the weekend, FOX Chicago Sunday's Dane Placko picked up the ball, saying that "every Chicago taxpayer should read" the latest article by Ben Joravsky and Mick Dumke. With the city's financial problems coming to a head, Placko told viewers, "Imagine how this budget would look if we weren't dealing with this huge TIF problem." Considering that TIF siphoned $552 million off the tax rolls last year alone the possibilities are indeed vast.  He then touched on an issue that we've written about extensively, noting that "a lot of the money is going to corporations to remodel buildings and such." Watch it:

PLACKO: In this week's article, the Reader outlines how the city maintains what is essentially a second budget, which it refuses to release. Even aldermen only get to see TIF information for their own wards. Not the big picture. And this is significant because the mayor controls a pot of TIF money that has grown to $1 billion, one-sixth the size of the entire budget. With so much money going to TIF, property taxes in non-TIF district have to go up to cover the money that's not going to the general revenue fund. Imagine how this budget would look if we weren't dealing with this huge TIF problem -- and a lot of the money going to corporations to remodel buildings and such.

"People have been getting upset about TIF for years," co-host Jack Conaty added, "I think it's going to peak here shortly."

Continue reading »

During Mayor Daley's budget address yesterday, we listened closely to see if he would make any mention of Chicago's other budget: the $1 billion in taxpayer dollars currently sitting in off-the-books tax increment financing (TIF) accounts. To no one's surprise, the mayor glossed over how this mayoral "piggy bank" -- which last year siphoned off $552 million from local taxing bodies like the schools and parks -- factored into his long-term thinking about the city's finances. That's because the mayor already has his own quiet plans for handing out the public funds, according to documents (PDF) obtained by the Reader's Ben Joravsky and Mick Dumke. They explain the significance in their new, must-read cover story:

[T]he money's supposed to be used to subsidize economic development in depressed communities that would otherwise receive no investment. But according to aldermen, and as the TIF documents we obtained show, the program is used to help clout-heavy developers and corporations, pay for basic infrastructure and services without the public oversight given the official budget, and strengthen the political position of the mayor. [...]

By moving more necessary expenditures into the secret budget that he ultimately controls, the mayor also wields even more power over every public entity, from the City Council to the public schools to the Park District. At various times at least half a dozen aldermen have told us that mayoral aides pressure them on key votes—such as the ordinances for funding the Olympics or moving the Children's Museum to Grant Park—by either promising to give their wards more TIF dollars or threatening to take TIF dollars away.

Bingo. While we have no way of tracking which TIF projects successfully deliver an economic boost and which don't, we do know this: The TIF system allows Mayor Daley to curry favor with Chicago's corporate elite while keeping the City Council in lock-step with his agenda.

In recent months, we've repeatedly highlighted how tens of millions of dollars from the downtown TIF accounts are regularly used to subsidize the renovations of swanky new corporate offices in the Loop.  It's infuriating to watch these giveaways (United Airlines secured $50 million from the city in just the past two years) at a time when Chicago faces a $520 million budget shortfall.  During an appearance on WFLD's Good Day Chicago this morning, the Better Government Association's Andy Shaw used our favored term for this ongoing practice: "corporate welfare." "We are subsidizing wealthy developers and all kinds of people who are friends and cronies of the administration when our taxes are sky-high," he said, holding up a copy of Joravsky and Dumke's article. "And this is wrong because we need transparency here." Watch it:

Continue reading »