The following is an op-ed by Charlton McIlwain, associate professor of media, culture and communications at New York University.
Black candidates must be especially image savvy to navigate the delicate contours of today’s racial politics. They must cultivate racial
appeal, without provoking racial resentment, and expend their racial
capital, without succumbing to the litany of stereotypes whites
associate with them. We thought Barack Obama mastered this art,
believing future black candidates must learn at his feet. But Republican
presidential hopeful Herman Cain might prove more teacher than
apprentice.
My co-author, Stephen Caliendo, and I analyzed over a thousand ads
researching our recent book about racial appeals in US elections. We
always returned to Mr. Cain’s 2004 Senate ads. Two aspects of those ads
demonstrate why Cain might be the Republican’s best salesman and
contrast to his fellow black rival.
First, there’s only ever one person in a Herman Cain ad: Herman Cain.
The rugged individualist
Nothing says rugged individualism louder than a lone black man standing
next to a bedrock image of his own name, exclaiming “I’m Herman Cain.”
Plenty of black candidates have pitched “I’m special because I’m black
and accomplished” to voters. Candidates as varied as Alan Wheat, J.C.
Watts, Gary Franks, Carol Moseley Braun, and Barack Obama have held
themselves out as portraits of black exceptionalism. But none has
convincingly sold the up-from-my-bootstraps image more effectively than
Cain.
Rival candidates touted distinctiveness on the one hand, but reveled in
all the help they had on the other. They spoke of help from family,
advisers, and benevolent, colorblind white voters.
“Who could’ve dreamed that a poor black kid from Eufaula Oklahoma would
grow up to be called Congressman?” Mr. Watts asked in several of his
1996 ads, for example, before adding, “but after all, this is America.”
“Missouri gave me a chance to reach for my dreams,” Mr. Wheat relishes
in one of his Senate ads. Obama’s ads were chock full of people who
helped him – law professors, legislative mentors, a multiracial band of
brothers and sisters.
You don’t see these images and sentiments in Cain’s ads. Like the
Marlboro man braving the wide-open plains, Cain presents himself as a
solitary man, resting alone on his credentials, indebted to no one. He
rarely invokes “us” and “we,” but speaks always of “I” and “me.”
This is the image of pure individualism that conservatives like to see
in all their candidates, and it is a prerequisite for its black ones.
Full-throated embrace of conservatism
But Cain couldn’t successfully sell his rugged individualism without a
second distinction in his ads – his full-throated embrace of
conservatism. “Conservative?” Cain repeatedly asks. “You bet.” He always
answers, casually, as if to say, “Why wouldn’t I be?”
Such acceptance is advantageous for black candidates seeking Republican
support; it’s as expedient as “liberal” is damaging to black Democrats.
Liberals are one thing; black liberals – a completely different beast.
Candidates opposing blacks usually supplement the liberal label. Black
candidates are “too liberal,” “dangerously liberal,” “extremely
liberal,” or, my favorite – “dangerously liberal with the truth” (as
Jesse Helms once described Harvey Gantt).
But Cain counters the black liberal stigma in one fell swoop. He stamped
“conservative” across his political ads, making the label his badge of
honor. You see, in today’s racial parlance, conservative is not only
antithetical to being liberal; it is antithetical to being black, which
is what you must be if you’re a black man looking for Republican votes.
Cain further showcases his conservative persona. In one such ad he
recalls one of his greatest life lessons. “My daddy always said, ’dem
that’s comin’, get on the wagon, dems that ain't, get out the way.”
Cain’s quaint recollection taps into conservative nostalgia. They remind
viewers that the good ‘ol days were not only simpler. They were days
when folks like Cain’s daddy still spoke the broken English of their
slave forebears, and tended the mules pulling those wagons.
With a few exceptions, Republicans have rejected black candidates. But
in an ironic twist of fate, polls and anecdotal evidence show that
Republicans’ best hope in 2012 just might be another black man. And
among a group of conservatives for whom not just any black will do,
Herman Cain not only fits the conservative bill; if he sticks to his
2004 strategy, he will show that he can effectively sell his
counter-stereotypically conservative image to both Republican primary
voters, as well as conservative-minded independents.
Charlton McIlwain is an associate professor of media, culture, and
communication at New York University and author of “Race Appeal: How
Candidates Invoke Race in US Elections.”
Didn't Cain get slaughtered in his 2004 campaign? Yes of course he refers to "me" and "I" in his ads but that's more a function of his Trump/Gingrich size ego than anything else. In any case his novelty candidacy seems to have collapsed under a series of gaffes that show the former pizza company executive isn't presidential material. Teabaggers embraced him for a few weeks evidently because they thought he inoculated them against charges of racism. They didn't quite grasp that his single biggest statement they so loved, that he wouldn't allow in Muslims in his government was well...deeply racist. ML King had a dream that someday people would be judged by the content of their character and not the color of their skin. Republicans still have it reversed with politicians like Cain and Allen West. They're not fooling anyone.
Mark,
I am reasonably certain that Islam is a religion, not a race. Therefore Mr. Cain's comment that he would be concerned about bringing a Muslim into his Cabinet or appointing on to the Federal bench is not racist.
Did Mr. Cain get slaughtered in his 2004 campaign. No. He got in late and finished 2nd in the primary ahead of 2 other establishment politicians.
Mark, as they said in Animal House, Drunk Dumb and Stupid is no way for you to go through life.
I'm just sayin'.
Apparently he has no foreign policy plans, no economic plans and no plans on how to extricate our military from our wars, his only mantra - like the rest of the Republican field, is the "Obama is bad" meme. Pathetic. I don't think he is a serious candidate, just hoping to rake in some big bucks - or maybe a Fox "news" contributor spot.
You can say he has no experience or whatever you want...But to say he is not a serious candidate flies in the face of facts. You might want to check out these two articles:
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2011/05/math-says-you-should-tak...
This article has the newest stats which, as good as they were in May, are even better now.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/election.aspx
I would not take him for granted at all. Not only does he have the highest intensity rating, but also the highest favorability rating. All he lacks is name recognition and that is moving up very quickly.
Mr. Cain has a true american exceptional life story. He was born in Jim Crow infested Atlanta, the son and grandson of farmers and great grandson of slaves. With his efforts he graduated from Morehouse college where he majored in Math and with a minor in physics from Purdue. He climbed corporate WHITE america before it was cool to hire and promote minorities. Was VP of Burger King, Pillsbury and CEO of Godfathers. He served as Mathematician supervisor for the Department of Navy and was Chairman of the board of the Federal Reserve in Kentucky. Cain, empowered himself and made himself into a successful man. He is a Baptist minister and has been married to the same woman for 43 years. What a life. I am sure if his parents were alive they would be very proud of their son.
I am a Hispanic woman, that voted Obama last election but will vote Cain. Empowerment over entitlement is my new motto. I want to be able to achieve through my efforts just like Cain did in a harder time in history. The man is an economics genious. Every company he has touched has prospered we need a President that will put America back to work. Is Mr. Cain conservative? What Baptist Minister isn't?
I am a Hispanic woman, that voted Obama last election but will vote Cain. Empowerment over entitlement is my new motto. I want to be able to achieve through my efforts just like Cain did in a harder time in history. The man is an economics genious. Every company he has touched has prospered we need a President that will put America back to work. Is Mr. Cain conservative? What Baptist Minister isn't?
I thank Mr. McIlwain for this article. Insightful and fact/research based. Personally I think all people will make progress under a Cain Administration. Pro-Business, Pro-Growth, Pro-Employment. We will all be better off.
I have met Mr. Cain a few times and he is one of the most intelligent, genuine and genuinely humble men I have ever met. While he understands that people sometimes need a hand up, as Mr. McIlwain points out he says "I" and "me".
His message isn't Yes We Can as in "Yes we can take from rich people and spread the wealth around" but rather his message seems to be "Yes I did and so can you."
Herman Cain is what we need. http://arealleader.com
Empowerment>Entitlement I'm tired of the race card, religion card, and whatever the hell card someone wants to pull. This campaign is about a philosophical difference between the left and right; it's not about rich vs poor, black vs white, social conservative vs 'other', etc. It comes down to one fundamental question, how large/influential should our Government be? Herman Cain believes the people should be empowered to run their lives and either succeed or fail on their own. Whereas Obama believes those who succeed are responsible for those who have failed.
Comments
Login or register to post comments