The makeup of Chicago's public housing households is evolving as more optimistic evidence of their socioeconomic well-being was noted in a report by the Chicago Housing Authority on the progress of the sometimes controversial Plan for Transformation.
The makeup of Chicago's public housing households is evolving as a new study shows more optimistic evidence of their socioeconomic well-being. A report released by the Chicago Housing Authority highlights progress made in the 12 years since the agency instituted its sometimes controversial Plan for Transformaiton.
The goal of the program was to overhaul the troubled public housing system, resulting in the demolition of some of the most notoriously violent
buildings and high-rises. The hope was that as mixed-income communities
are ushered in and poverty is de-concentrated, the city would
strengthen.
The new CHA report (PDF) set out to dispel myths about the plan,
primarily the 16,500 families in 1999 who were guaranteed the right to
return to public housing. For starters, the belief that former residents
were migrating to the suburbs proved false as only 60 families
relocated there, while 11 went out of the state. Of the 60, the highest
number (12) went to south suburban Riverdale.
Most of those relocated moved within the city and many went to high-poverty neighborhoods, similar to those they left behind. Some
35 percent of them did use vouchers to move to areas where poverty rates were
below 23 percent, despite the city’s average poverty rate hovering at 20
percent. In all, the families spread out to land in 75 of the 77 community
areas that make up the city.
As for the actual makeup of all
households, the number of young children (age 15 and under) went from
about 50 percent of the family population in 2000, to only 35 percent in
2010. Conversely, the number of seniors (age 50 and over) in non-senior
specific family housing grew from 9 percent to 17 percent in the same
10-year period. The number of young adults (age 16 to 20) also grew from
10 to 17 percent, the report said. The gender of the heads of
households remained about the same, with 88 percent female in 2000 to 89
percent in 2010.
The race of the heads of households also
diversified. In 2000, 93 percent were black, 7 percent were white, and 1
percent were neither. Ten years later, 88 percent were black and 11
percent were white. The number of Hispanic household heads nearly doubled.
The report also touted the quality
of life for the families by way of employment and income. The number of
employed household heads of working age (18 to 61 years old) went from
only 15 percent in 1999, to about 32.3 percent in 2005, climbing to
41.5 percent by the end of 2010. In looking at the original families
from before the plan, the Illinois Department of Employment Security
data showed the annual income of those household heads almost doubled
from $10,160 in 1999 to $19,244 in 2009.
These optimistic numbers
are partly due to a work requirement for the heads implemented in 2009,
but the report also breaks down city programs used to get it to be this
way. There was more individualized attention through case managers
assigned a main goal of helping residents -- 89 percent of whom took
advantage of the opportunities -- find jobs and keep working. There was
the $27 million workforce development program Opportunity Chicago; the
direct job placement and hiring program Section 3; transitional jobs, or
time-limited subsidized jobs that included paid work and skill
development like contextualized literacy programming and technical
training; and a deal struck with the City Colleges of Chicago that
allowed free access to all residents, including to the system’s
continuing education and GED and degree programs.
Still, the
report failed to discuss the problems the relocated families face, chief among them the
slow pace of redevelopment at former public housing sites designated as
mixed-income areas. As of late July 2009, just 36 percent -- 2,656 out
of 7,303 -- of the public housing units the Chicago Housing Authority
plans to build at 12 former CHA sites around the city were complete. And
then there’s the fact unearthed by the Sun-Times that “a disturbing 2,202 families are
unaccounted for. Under plan they had the right to return to CHA, but the
agency has now lost track of them and has no idea where they are."
The report failed to discuss the problems the relocated families face, the Local Government must look the solution for this problem, to give them accommodation.
Keep up the great work, its hard to find good ones. http://sinergibisnis.com/ have added to my favorites. Thank You.
http://jasaseomurah.om-onny.com/ and http://www.om-onny.com/. I will often visit here. http://pasangiklanbaris.om-onny.com/
As a result, over the accomplished two decades, gentrification processes accept assuredly began to abolish the acrid acumen amid "Slum" and "Gold Coast,
http://recadosparafacebook.org/
There are institutions set up to aid these people, but a lot of do not seek out help. Although the amount of "rough sleepers" is rising, I still accept that we will anon see a abatement in this number. http://jogos-de-culinaria.org
Comments
Login or register to post comments