Health Care Round-Up: Moderate Dems Voice Conerns, Hamos On Stupak, More Actions

Some more health care news...

Moderate Democrats Voice Concerns

In her Sun-Times column this morning, Carol Marin singles out Democratic Reps. Melissa Bean and Bill Foster for their yes votes in favor of health care legislation this past weekend:

We may disagree with one another on whether, in the end, this legislation is good for America. Or whether we as a nation can afford all of its provisions.

But what is harder to disagree with is that health care in this country, at the moment, is a ragged, patched quilt of different levels of coverage.

And for between 35 million and 45 million of us, there's no coverage at all.

That's why this vote, to my mind anyway, was historic. And why it took some moxie to say yes.

Foster told Marin that his vote was "easy," yet he's still publicly criticizing some key planks of the legislation including the design of the public option. Foster contends that if the government is allowed to borrow money for start-up costs at a lower interest rate than private companies, the insurance industry will be put at a disadvantage. Bean isn't totally sold yet, either. She tells the Pioneer Press that she's seeking "improved cost containment measures" like the creation of an Independent Medicare Advisory Council, which would have the authority to make recommendations to the president on annual Medicare payment rates and other reforms.

Meanwhile, Rep. Debbie Halvorson has released a slick video explaining why she supported the legislation. There aren't a lot of legislative details in the spot, but there are three testimonials from women in the 11th district who have faced medical and financial strains because of inadequate health insurance coverage. "I really believe this bill," Halvorson says to close the piece, "is going to move us into the direction of affordable, accessible, and quality health care." Watch it:

Hamos: Stupak Amendment Is Unacceptable

While State Rep. Julie Hamos is just a candidate for Congress at the moment, the 10th District Democratic contender hinted yesterday that if she were on Capitol Hill last weekend, she would have voted against any bill that included language similar to the Stupak amendment. Here's her statement:

The Affordable Health Care Act is an important victory in the fight for quality, affordable health care. However, I am adamantly opposed to the last-minute addition of the anti-choice Stupak Amendment. I am disappointed that some Members of Congress would try to force a choice between health care reform for all with no reproductive health care for some.

I reached out to Rep. Jan Schakowsky and she told me that key members of the House pro-choice caucus met on Monday with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and all of them agreed that the anti-choice language is unacceptable. I agree. They are hopeful that they can make the needed changes in the Senate or in the subsequent Conference Committee.

I have fought for women's reproductive freedom for decades -- from serving on the Board of Directors of Planned Parenthood to being involved in every legislative initiative affecting choice or reproductive health care. The Stupak Amendment is another clear reminder of how important it is to have a Representative in Congress who understands what is at stake and will stand up for what matters.

Actions Coming Up

Health care activists are still working hard to pressure recalcitrant lawmakers and insurance industry officials to support reform. Tomorrow, MoveOn's Rockford branch will protest outside of Republican Rep. Don Manzullo’s office at 12:00 pm "to criticize him for siding with the insurance industry instead of Illinois families by voting against health care reform with a public option during a recent House vote."

Next Tuesday, folks affiliated with Health Care for American Now are meeting at the headquarters of Blue Cross/Blue Shield in Chicago and marching to the Renaissance Hotel, where the industry group American Health Insurance Plans is holding their national conference. You can find more information, as well as a related video, at their website.

Comments

What an amazing video from Congresswoman Halvorson. Those three women in the video is exactly why we need health care reform. Thank you Congresswoman for standing up for affordable and accessible health care for all!

Meanwhile Judy Biggert IL-13 voted for the Stupak amendment and as expected against the HCR bill itself. She has a pattern and it's nothing new.

She doesn't have some religious objection to abortion, she's always claimed to be pro-choice. She threw women's rights overboard at the first opportunity in a cynical effort to scuttle the overall bill. That's a shame because if that amendment stays in the final legislation it will make health care coverage more expensive for everybody including the US taxpaper and her favorite lobby the health insurance companies.

Hamos may now hint that she would vote against the bill, but in an email blast, she congratulated 'us' all for passage of the bill, giving it blanket approval, without stipulating any reservations. In her haste to take credit for and support of the passage of the health care reform bill, she clearly failed to read it before jumping on the bandwagon. If she had done even a minimal amount of homework she would have been aware that the Stupak-Pitts amendment made the bill unacceptable to any who support women's rights. A pro-choice woman would have to work hard to be as ignorant of the facts as Hamos was to make the statement she made. (As an average citizen, I received several emails daily from various pro-choice groups, warning me of this poisonous amendment) The same evening, she appeared at a candidates' forum where she gave little indication that she had any but the most tenuous grasp of the issue and was unaware of the details of the bill including the Stupak-Pitts amendment. She has since begun to amend her initial statement, but 'hinting' that she might not vote for something while simultaneously lauding its passage in an email blast is a political Kirk-like strategy that we can do without.

Healthcare reform was a landmark piece of legislation and it was no small feat that it passed out of the house. It had the support of every Democrat in the Illinois delegation. The president also sent out an email thanking people for their support and telling them that the fight is not over. Of course Hamos opposes the Stupak amendment. She has been fighting for reproductive rights and other women's health issues for as long as she was in the General Assembly. Stupak will be removed from the final bill. The only reason it is in there is to drive a wedge between the progressives. Don't take the bait.

Hamos didn't event mention Stupak in her initial email blast - it was all shiny, happy stuff. She didn't seem to realize the significance of this amendment until several pro-choice folks pointed it out to her in no uncertain terms. Clearly she wants to be the first to comment on and align herself with good news - to the point that she reacts without thinking things through. Not a trait I look for in a congressional rep.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Progress Illinois' intention is to foster community and to maintain a comfortable and constructive blogging environment. While we encourage and appreciates different points of view, we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.

Discussion on this site is moderated. All comments submitted will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.

We will not publish comments that we consider:

  • off-topic
  • long-winded or containing excessive text from another source
  • inflammatory
  • commercial promotion

Please leave a name or nickname when commenting, as it makes it easier for others to respond directly.