Explore our content

All types | All dates | All authors
Pat Quinn
Quick Hit
by Adam Doster
1:05pm
Tue Mar 23, 2010

The Cost Of A Medicaid Expansion

Gov. Pat Quinn says he is still waiting for numbers from the state about how much the the Medicaid expansion passed in the Senate health care bill will cost Illinois. But with the Senate poised to change how the expansion is funded through the budget reconciliation process, we wanted to update our previous back-of-the-envelope estimate.

The Illinois Medicaid program cost $12.6 billion in FY 2007. That includes the combined contributions of both the state and federal government. At that time, there were approximately 2.42 million enrolees, meaning the cost per patient is roughly $5,227. If 500,000 additional folks in Illinois are granted access (which is close to most estimates), that will increase the overall cost by approximately $2.6 billion annually. Herein lies the $2 billion figure that Republicans are claiming the expansion would cost the state over the next decade.

The crucial context they've chosen to leave out, however, is that that the federal government will pick up the tab for most of the extension. After covering the full cost until 2016, Washington will cover 95 percent of the expansion in 2017, meaning Illinois would need to pay an additional $130 million that year. In 2018, the federal assistance drops to 94 percent, costing Illinois $156 million. In 2019, it drops one more percentage point, adding $183 million to the state budget. That means the grand total Illinois would owe, between 2014 and 2019, will be approximately $469 million. Thought about another way, Illinois will extend health coverage to about 5 percent of its population at a cost of just $40 per person annually. 

Quick Hit
by Adam Doster
1:49pm
Wed Mar 17, 2010

Quinn Pushes Congress On Renewables

Frustrated with the lack of federal action to spur job growth and mitigate carbon emissions, Gov. Pat Quinn and 28 other governors sent a list of recommendations (PDF) to Congress yesterday and urged the adoption of a federal renewable energy standard.

If the governors get their way, lawmakers in Washington would require electric utilities to generate 10 percent of their electricity from renewable sources (solar, wind, or biopower) by 2012. That would put the nation on pace to obtain 20 percent of its energy from renewables by 2020, a target environmentalists consider reasonable. Illinois already has stronger renewable energy standards on the books for both electrical and natural gas companies. Even so, the state would benefit because uniform standards would increase national demand for renewable energy produced within our borders. 

The Christian Science Monitor has a nice recap of the report here.

Quick Hit
by Josh Kalven
10:36am
Tue Mar 16, 2010

Memo To AP: Quinn Has A "Backup Plan"

Today's AP article on Gov. Pat Quinn's WTTW appearance takes an odd angle.  The version that appeared in the Daily Chronicle is headlined "Quinn won't discuss backup plan" and reports: "Gov. Pat Quinn refused to say Monday whether he has a plan to avoid deep cuts in education if lawmakers resist his call to raise the state income tax."

During the Democratic gubernatorial primary, we criticized challenger Dan Hynes -- who was pushing a progressive income tax system as a solution to the budget crisis -- for not offering a "plan B" if legislators didn't go for his plan this spring.  But the current situation is quite different.  Unlike Hynes, Quinn is talking candidly about the specific types of cuts he foresees in lieu of an income tax increase.  You can disagree with what he's targeting; but you can't deny that it represents a "plan B." 

The AP's assumption seems to be that Quinn should provide a menu of revenue options that lawmakers can pick from.  What it misses is that those criticizing Quinn's plan aren't themselves offering any serious alternatives.  GOP gubernatorial nominee Bill Brady, for instance, won't even put his vague budget proposal in writing.  Where's the AP article on that?