Explore our content

All types | All dates | All authors
Mark Kirk
PI Original
by Progress Illinois
7:06pm
Tue Nov 2, 2010

Live Blog: The Next Illinois Senator

Democrats across the country are watching Illinois as the race for U.S. Senate between Democrat Alexi Giannoulias and Republican Mark Kirk comes to an end tonight. A win by Giannoulias would likely mean a continued majority for Democrats in the U.S. Senate.

PI Original
by Adam Doster and Micah Maidenberg
1:43pm
Mon Nov 1, 2010

Wrong For Illinois: The Mark Kirk Reader

U.S. Rep. Mark Kirk is the wrong man to serve Illinois in the U.S. Senate. We make the case below.

Quick Hit
by Adam Doster
3:31pm
Fri Oct 29, 2010

Religious Leaders: Who Is The Real Mark Kirk?

Immigration reform advocates in Illinois are none too pleased with U.S. Senate candidate Mark Kirk. The Republican nominee admitted again during a debate last week that it's "not the time" to pass the DREAM Act, which would provide upstanding undocumented children a pathway to citizenship should they complete two years of college or military service. Outside of his Chicago campaign office this morning, a series of religious figures questioned why Kirk hasn't made any time to discuss the issue with them over the past two years. "Request after request," says Lawrence Benito of Illinois Immigrant Action, "[and] no answer." Watch it:

Quick Hit
by Adam Doster
12:13pm
Fri Oct 29, 2010

Giannoulias And Hartmarx

U.S. Rep. Mark Kirk is lobbing a strange accusation at his Democratic rival, Alexi Giannoulias. In a statement yesterday, the Republican accused the state treasurer of exaggerating his role in last year's Hartmarx saga by claiming that he had threatened to sever an $8 billion contract with Wells Fargo if the bank ultimately liquidated the century-old clothier. Kirk points out that Wells acts as the state's "money custodian" and only earns $96,000 for its work overseeing Illinois' financial assets, which total roughly $8 billion. But Giannoulias himself acknowledged last year that the "deposits they receive are not substantial." Watch it:

The threat worked, it should be said.

If Giannoulias was lying about the role he played in helping to save 600 Hartmarx jobs in Illinois, particularly the work he did in raising the profile of a liquidation process that could have been entirely overlooked without his assistance, why would the union who represents the Hartmarx workers support his campaign? Why would the Wall Street Journal write earlier this year that he's a "Hartmarx Hero?" And does Kirk seriously want to start bemoaning another pol for inflating his resume?