Explore our content

All types | All dates | All authors
Mark Kirk
Quick Hit
by Adam Doster
10:15am
Tue Nov 30, 2010

Kirk On Unemployment Benefits: Extension "Misguided"

Unless Congress takes dramatic action today, roughly 127,000 Illinoisans will exhaust their unemployment insurance this evening.

Today marks the funding deadline for two federal programs that, for roughly two years, have provided extended benefits to Americans looking for work. In the last 40 years, the U.S. has never allowed jobless insurance to expire when unemployment was so high. And why should we? Providing a paycheck to those who've been thrown out of their jobs during the worst recession in decades is humane and economically beneficial.

Fresh off their Election Day gains, Republicans in Washington want to pursue their campaign pledge of extending the Bush-era tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans. Some progressives think Democrats should use the unemployment insurance programs as a bargaining chip to pass a compromise on the tax plan. U.S. Sen. Mark Kirk doesn't seem interested. In two separate interviews recorded by the Wonk Room, Illinois' new senator claimed the benefit extension would be "misguided" but the tax cut should be handed over to millionaires "no matter what" the effect on the nation’s budget. Watch:

Only 32 percent of respondents in a recent survey of Illinois voters thought the tax cuts should remain in place for all income levels. Perhaps Kirk should remember that when he votes from his new perch.

PI Original
by Micah Maidenberg
3:21pm
Mon Nov 29, 2010

Immigrant Advocates Press Kirk On DREAM Act

Immigrant advocates are hoping Illinois' new Republican Senator Mark Kirk, who said he didn't support the DREAM Act during his squeaker of a victory on November 2, is ready to take another look at the bill now that he's joining Congress' Upper Chamber.

PI Original
by Adam Doster
1:20pm
Tue Nov 9, 2010

The Long Road To Full Employment

There's a menu of viable economic policy initiatives out there that would assist unemployed people and cash-strapped states. Will Congress fund any of them?

Quick Hit
by Adam Doster
1:10pm
Mon Nov 8, 2010

The "Voter Fraud" Canard

We go through this charade every election cycle. In the weeks leading up to Election Day, Republicans claim that Democrats and their allies are coordinating to steal the election through massive voter fraud campaigns. Here in Illinois, Senator-elect Mark Kirk and the Republican Party dispatched election lawyers to "vulnerable precincts ... where the other side might be tempted to jigger the numbers somewhat." When the election actually rolls around, those partisan officials surely don't prevent the theft of votes; widespread voter fraud is insanely complicated to pull off and thus never happens. Indeed, as Demos' Tova Andrea Wang wrote last Thursday, there was a "sudden silence from the fraud-mongerers and Tea Party poll watch groups" because they could not find "one case of substantiated fraud at the polling place." But the media takes the political stunt seriously, so the GOP wails about the "problem" every year. In doing so, they diminish the credibility of the electoral system and lay the groundwork for more sophisticated voter suppression tactics. More from Wang:

It is well established through academic research, reports from elections officials and law enforcement statistics that voter fraud at the polling place is almost non-existent. The motivation for ginning up this bogeyman is to encourage activities such as vote caging and challenges designed to intimidate certain groups of voters and ultimately enact policies such as proof of citizenship and voter ID laws that will make it harder for disadvantaged groups to exercise their right to vote. Such efforts must continue to be combated as weapons of disenfranchisement rather than fraud fighting.

What's most infuriating about the voter fraud canard is that our voting system still has legitimate problems. In Illinois, poll workers throughout the state acknowledged confusion over who was eligible to file a regular or provisional ballot. The Election Protection Coalition, for example, received complaints that some election judges were requiring individuals on a list of "suspended voters" to cast provisional ballots even though they were entitled to a regular ballot if they provided required identification. Four years ago, plenty of Illinois' provisional ballots were rejected for a variety of reasons ranging from registration list errors, address changes, and a lack of provisional ballots at polling places. If the GOP was serious about preserving the franchise, they would have worked with the Attorney General's office to clear up this confusion before November 2. But ensuring that all voters get the chance to cast a ballot isn't really one of their top priorities.

Quick Hit
by Progress Illinois
2:14pm
Thu Nov 4, 2010

Dark Money Fueled Kirk Victory

The 2010 election was the first campaign following the U.S. Supreme Court's controversial decision that allowed corporations to spend unlimited money on behalf of political candidates. According to a new study by a watchdog group, of the contests that changed hands on Tuesday, no one benefited more from this "dark money" than Illinois' Senator-elect Mark Kirk.

The watchdog group Public Citizen released a report (PDF) showing that of the 74 seats that switched parties on Election Day, Kirk received far more from these shadow outside groups than any other candidate. In the race for Senate, Kirk received over $8.7 million from groups accepting unlimited contributions or not disclosing the source of their money, compared to about $800,000 for Democratic candidate Alexi Giannoulias.

The biggest chunk of cash was routed through Crossroads Grassroots Policy Strategies, a group set up by Karl Rove. According to Public Citizen, Crossroads GPS dumped $5.6 million into ads hitting Giannoulias. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce poured another $1.7 million into Illinois.

The outpouring of support from these groups, coupled with Kirk's vote against the DISCLOSE Act, suggests the state's new junior Senator might be hesitant to support meaningful campaign finance reform in the upper chamber.