Explore our content

All types | All dates | All authors
Transportation
Quick Hit
by Micah Maidenberg
5:44pm
Mon Jan 17, 2011

Poll: Transit Is A Major Mayoral Issue

Eighty percent of Chicagoans likely to vote in next month's election but who haven't decided upon a mayoral candidate yet believe good public transit is an "important immediate concern" for the next mayoral administration. That intriguing finding comes courtesy of a recent survey of 500 likely Chicago voters conducted for the Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU) in Washington, whose Local 308 affiliate represents frontline CTA employees.

In other words, the candidate who offers solutions the doomsday-riddled CTA may be able to garner significant votes for herself or himself. To date, the six remaining mayoral candidates have not even tried to do this. The Tribune's John Hilkevich points out none have released recommendations discussing how they view transportation issues. It is a pretty remarkable point, given that last year the region's primary public transit agency cut 9 percent of its train service and a whopping 18 percent of its bus service, slowing down the system and resulting in the layoffs of more than 1,000 layoffs CTA personnel.

ATU wants the city's next mayor to be actively engaged in public transit issues. In a white paper (which can be downloaded from ATU's website), the union calls on Chicago's next chief executive to push the region's congressional delegation to support HR 2746 in Congress. The legislation would give big city transit agencies more options in how they could spend federal transit dollars, allowing urban areas with populations of more than 200,000 to use federal transit dollars on system operations. Currently, most of those dollars in big cities may only be spent on capital projects. The rule means, as the white paper states, federal dollars can be used for "design engineering for the North Park Bus Plug-Ins, technology implementation services to provide hi-definition and thermal cameras" but not for wages, jobs, and rides for transit-using Chicagoans. (The city's "recovery ratio," mandated by the state, is particularly rigid and limits the agency's operational fleixibility, too.)

At least the transit issue is getting some attention in the press and from advocacy groups. Don't forget that a coalition of eight organizations have called on the mayoral contenders to sign on to the Sustainable Transportation Platform, an ambitious document (PDF) that touches on everything from bike access to high-speed rail to raising the state's gasoline tax.

Quick Hit
by Micah Maidenberg
12:09pm
Tue Jan 4, 2011

Another Midwestern Rail Project Is Threatened

Rail projects in the Midwest have sustained hit after hit since the November elections, when GOP lawmakers took control of several governors' mansions and legislative bodies across the region. In Wisconsin, newly elected GOP Gov. Scott Walker scuttled an $810 million Madison-to-Milwaukee high-speed rail line. The new Republican governor of Ohio, John Kasich, did the same for a high-speed rail plan that would have linked Cincinnati and Cleveland. Now Republicans in Iowa are getting into the act.

A budget bill released by GOP lawmakers in the Hawkeye State yesterday does not provide necessary state dollars to support a new Amtrak line set to run daily between Iowa City and Chicago. A report in the Des Moines Register called that lack of funding a likely "death blow" for the project, and the state's Department of Transportation may ultimately have to return $81.4 million the federal government has allocated for it. The Illinois Department of Transportation received around $149 million to build out its share of the rail line.

Republicans say they are worried about the cost of the project. "The Iowa Legislature has previously committed $10 million for Iowa’s share of the train project, and lawmakers have been asked to appropriate an additional $10 million in start-up costs," the Register reported. A $3 million annual subsidy would also be required. But rail advocates are making the case that the economic benefits generated by high-speed rail would far outweigh Iowa's share of the capital costs and annual subsidy. The Quad-Cities Passenger Rail Coalition estimates the $3 million annually would return $11.8 million in economic benefits for the state and create 31 new jobs each year. 

All the news on this front isn't bad. GOP Gov.-elect Terry Branstad says he's keeping an "open mind" about the rail line. And Illinois' share of the project, from Moline to Chicago, is still on track. But it's increasingly looking like Illinois is alone in its determination to build its share of the Midwestern high-speed rail network. Reaping the economic (like creating 57,000 permanent jobs in the region and 15,200 temporary jobs during the 10 years it would take to build the system) and environmental benefits of efficient, interconnected rail in the Midwest is going to require more than one state participating, however.

Quick Hit
by Adam Doster
10:18am
Thu Dec 30, 2010

New Year, Same Ole Parking Woes

On Saturday, Chicago's parking meter rates will jump once again. Folks leaving their car downtown will now pay $5-per-hour for the privilege, up from $4.25 in 2010. Neighborhood spaces will cost $1.50-per-hour, up from $1.25 currently. It's the third of five scheduled annual rate increases written into the city's lease of its meter system to Chicago Parking Meters LLC. After 2013, rate hikes will be tied to inflation.

The bump is an annual reminder of how crappy the parking meter deal really was. Instead of treating the meters like a transit tool and raising the cost of downtown parking sensibly over time, the City Council outsourced the task to a politically-connected firm at a cheap price, forgoing a massive revenue stream. It's no surprise why so many aldermanic and mayoral candidates are going out of their way to criticize the Daley administration's lease in particular and promise more asset sale scrutiny more generally. Now, citizens have to make sure those pols uphold their pledges.