The controversy over Sen. Roland Burris' appointment to Illinois' junior senate seat may seem like a lifetime ago. But a group of well-known local attorneys is making a last-ditch effort to force Gov. Pat Quinn to call a special election, thus giving the public the final say about who represents them.
Today, former alderman Marty Oberman led the oral arguments for his team of co-counselors -- which includes Tom Geoghegan, Scott Frankel, and Rob Cohen -- in a federal appellate court. The appeal is based on the same case that the team argued before U.S. District Judge John F. Grady earlier this year. Regular readers may recall that the challenge was an effort to force Quinn to issue a “writ of elections," which would trigger the General Assembly to set a special election date.
The gist of the case, Oberman tells us, is that the 17th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was crafted to guarantee the electorate's right to choose its representation democratically. That, the plaintiffs argue, usurps state law, which grants the governor appointment powers.
"The purpose of the 17th Amendment was to have popular elections of senators," Oberman argued in court today. "It wasn't to have appointments."
Moreover, Oberman argued today, appointments are intended to be temporary; therefore, a special election needs to be called before, not upon, the end of a term. He explains the significance to WBEZ:
There's no more important right in a democracy than the right to vote for the people who are making decisions for you. And in Illinois one of our Senate votes is sitting there not having been elected, but having been appointed.
Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan's office, which is defending the governor, is standing by the favorable lower court ruling. Only time will tell if it stands. Stay tuned.







Comments
Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 09/17/2009 - 22:28
The audio link for Oberman's argument is a dead link. Dunno if its my comp or the link itself.
Josh Kalven on Fri, 09/18/2009 - 07:59
It's not your computer, Anon. It turned out to be a temporary link (which we've now taken down). If we can upload the audio ourselves, we'll add a new link.
RestoreFederalism (not verified) on Fri, 09/18/2009 - 08:58
You seem to suggest that there are only two options (either the governor appoints, or the electorate votes). There is another option: the original constitutional design had the state legislatures appointing Senators to serve in Washington much like ambassadors do today in the United Nations.
Repealing the 17th Amendment (which would move the country toward the federal vision of Jefferson, Madison, Hamilton and Jay - the constitututional structure that kept the national government limited for 120 years) is perfectly reasonable. Big government IS big government because of the 17th, and repealing the 17th would be an astonishingly smart step toward a more sustainable system.
If the 17th were repealed, Illinois would certainly have a different, and more reputable Senator.
http://www.restorefederalism.org
Ben (not verified) on Fri, 09/18/2009 - 16:24
The 17th Amendment passed because the legislatures were taking bribes to make appointments to the Senate...
RestoreFederalism (not verified) on Sat, 09/19/2009 - 15:46
That is one reason it was ratified, yes. Now ask yourself: Did the 17th Amendment increase or decrease the volume of corruption in Senatorial elections? The 17th was clearly a failure if its main purpose was to get rid of corruption. It would have been FAR better to deal with the corruption as corruption, rather than destroying the constitutional structure.
wow leveling guide (not verified) on Tue, 11/17/2009 - 00:47
The 17th Amendment passed because the legislatures were taking bribes to make appointments to the Senate...
Post new comment
Progress Illinois' intention is to foster community and to maintain a comfortable and constructive blogging environment. While we encourage and appreciates different points of view, we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.
Discussion on this site is moderated. All comments submitted will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.
We will not publish comments that we consider:
Please leave a name or nickname when commenting, as it makes it easier for others to respond directly.