Over the past few months, we've been chronicling the holes
in Illinois' safety net created by the short-sighted welfare reforms
instituted in the mid-Nineties. Regular readers know that the work
requirements attached to the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families
(TANF) program were pitched at the time as a way to empower people to
reenter the workforce. But as the booming job market went bust, many of
the Prairie State's poorest families failed to find steady work and
have since been tipped toward deep poverty with no hope for aid.
Not surprisingly, the same scenario is playing out in states across the country.
In its latest round of research on the effectiveness of public assistance programs, the Center of Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) found that 1.3 million fewer children would be living in extreme poverty had the safety net been as sturdy in 2005 as it was in 1995.
The report explains:
The erosion of the safety net’s antipoverty effectiveness was concentrated at the very bottom of the income scale ... for children whose non-safety-net income was below 50 percent of the poverty line, the share lifted above half of the poverty line dropped from 88 percent to 76 percent, a decline of 12 percentage points.
With the economy skidding further into a recession and statewide unemployment now pushing past 10 percent, even the bright spot in the TANF reform -- success in dragging more working-poor people across the poverty line by supplementing their meager wages -- has been dim here in Illinois. Heartland Alliance's Tim Klein explained in a recent blog post:
Compared to the rest of the country, Illinois is woefully underachieving in making sure eligible families are accessing the program. Illinois only provides TANF cash assistance to nine percent of all children in the state who are eligible for those services - the very services that provide the most important safe guards in keeping children out of poverty.
Fortunately, supplemental spending under the stimulus plan has provided a buffer for millions of struggling households. By boosting food stamp benefits, expanding the Earned Income Tax and Child Tax credits, and creating incentives for states to modernize their unemployment insurance rules and reform TANF (both of which Illinois has taken advantage of), CPBB estimates that 1 million additional children were spared from poverty this year. But, as the New York Times notes, it's only a short-term fix:
Even after growth resumes, all signs are that the recession’s impacts will be protracted, said Harry J. Holzer, a labor economist at Georgetown University. “We’ll not only see an increase in poverty and unemployment, but those numbers are not going to improve quickly,” Mr. Holzer said. [...]
“It’s a good thing we have the stimulus package,” [CBPP researcher Arloc] Sherman said. “But what happens to the most vulnerable families in two years, when most of the provisions expire?
That's a question other economists have been asking as well. University of Michigan economist Sheldon Danziger told the Times that the lack of resilience during an economic downturn brings “a new focus on the need for expanding and modernizing the social safety net.” Considering the growing body of evidence on the efficacy of these investments -- look no further than the 14 million people (noted in the CBPP graph above) who were lifted out poverty in 2005 -- bolstering the safety net to catch more of those in need is clearly good public policy. As TANF comes up for federal reauthorization next year, that would be a good place to start.







Comments
HoldenE on Fri, 07/10/2009 - 04:09
Public assistance programs are designed to help state and local government agencies and some non-profit organizations recover from the effects of disasters. There is the realization that, in many cases, a community may not have sufficient funds on-hand to rebuild an entire infrastructure following a major disaster.They sometimes lack extra cash in it. Public assistance programs typically involve a cost-sharing arrangement between the local government (25%) and the federal government (75%).
Although the public assistance program is funded largely by FEMA, the state has the burden of managing the program. The state is the grant administrator for all funds provided under the Public Assistance Program. Part 13 of the Code of Federal Regulations gives the states more discretion to administer federal programs in accordance with their own procedures and thereby simplify the program and reduce delays. As grantee, the state is responsible for administering the programmatic and grants management requirements of the Public Assistance Program. Key among the programmatic requirements is informing the applicants of the assistance available to them -- what is eligible and how to apply for it. Grant management includes applying for federal assistance, monitoring and closing out the grant. The state and FEMA work in partnership to provide prompt and consistent service to all applicants.
Post new comment
Progress Illinois' intention is to foster community and to maintain a comfortable and constructive blogging environment. While we encourage and appreciates different points of view, we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.
Discussion on this site is moderated. All comments submitted will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.
We will not publish comments that we consider:
Please leave a name or nickname when commenting, as it makes it easier for others to respond directly.