After waiting months to ensure that he would not face Attorney
General Lisa Madigan in a general election battle, GOP Rep. Mark Kirk
is officially entering the 2010 Senate race this morning. Kirk frustrated
both local and national Republicans with his indecision, so he's hoping
to bolster his campaign with some early, high-profile endorsements from
within his own party. According to FOX Chicago, one such supporter will
be former Gov. Jim Edgar, who is scheduled to appear with Kirk when he
launches his campaign in Kennilworth minutes from now.
Edgar's backing is not a surprise. In an interview with the State Journal-Register last November, he cited Kirk's potential Senate candidacy as a way for the Republican Party to "move to the middle" in Illinois:
[Edgar] pointed to the re-election of U.S. Rep. Mark Kirk of Highland Park, a moderate Republican who won in what basically is a Democratic area.
“That gives us, I think, the kind of person to run for the U.S. Senate in two years,” Edgar said.
But in the same interview, the former governor suggested that the party find candidates Latinos can support:
“We cannot lose the Hispanic vote like we’ve lost the African-American vote, or we’re going to be a minority party forever,” Edgar said.
As we pointed out at the time, if growing Latino support is part of the GOP strategy, Kirk is an odd choice. The Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights has already released a memo arguing that Kirk is unlikely to draw support from the immigrant community. It's not hard to see why.
As his two-time Democratic challenger certainly remembers, Kirk issued a series of mailers in 2006 claiming "Dan Seals Says Amnesty Is The Answer." He followed up those tactics by suggesting on the House floor that the U.S. should have border patrol agents distribute condoms to stem the flow of Mexicans into the U.S., even though Mexican fertility rates have plummeted since 1980. Four years ago, he voted for border fence as well as several bills sponsored by xenophobic Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-CO).
The list of transgressions doesn't stop there. In 2007, Kirk was tacitly endorsed by a local white supremacist organization -- Chicago Friends Of American Renaissance -- for holding immigration views that were "encouraging." And this past April, speaking before the Chicago City Club, Kirk dodged a question about comprehensive immigration reform from Ahmed Rehab of the Council on American-Islamic Relations. "He's lost," Rehab told us after the speech. "He doesn't have an answer because he doesn't have a solution."
Of course, immigration reform isn't the only issue of importance to Latinos, who make up 20 percent of the Chicagoland population. But it's near the top for many families struggling to stay united and keep food on the table.







Comments
Truth Will Set You Free... (not verified) on Mon, 07/20/2009 - 16:21
Mark Kirk is just the candidate the GOP needs to win back this Senate seat. His thoughtful, independent leadership is exactly what we need, especially in light of the debacle that currently exists. We're sick of Illinois being the epitome of political corruption in the the United States because of recent Democrat mismanagement. Congressman Kirk is endorsed by all major Republican leaders, nationally and here in the state of Illinois. We need to stand with him, as citizens of Illinois eager for real change, so we win back this seat in 2010.
Ivan (not verified) on Tue, 07/21/2009 - 12:48
racist alert!!!not a chance for election...maybe in alabama, to be best buddies w/ the biggest redneck of them all-senator jeff sessions.
Katherine F. Shapiro (not verified) on Thu, 07/23/2009 - 10:59
Ivan,
There's a difference between racism and political realities. Latinos are often considered a voting block with common priorities and needs from their elected leaders. If any candidate tries to win them by working on immigration, it's no different than being conscious of how many Jews consider Israeli relations a priority or how many Catholics are pro-life. Political tribes are useful tools, and, while generalized, not thoroughly inaccurate, and certainly not condescending in a racist sense.
Post new comment
Progress Illinois' intention is to foster community and to maintain a comfortable and constructive blogging environment. While we encourage and appreciates different points of view, we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.
Discussion on this site is moderated. All comments submitted will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.
We will not publish comments that we consider:
Please leave a name or nickname when commenting, as it makes it easier for others to respond directly.