Hartmarx Officially Names Emerisque As "Stalking Horse" Bidder

In his article on the ongoing Hartmarx saga last night, the New York Times' Steven Greenhouse suggested that the bankrupt clothier's main creditor, Wells Fargo, has been trying to prevent the company's board from selecting Emerisque, a British private equity firm, as its favored bidder.  Specifically, he reported that Wells Fargo has "threatened to cut off future credit, perhaps preventing Hartmarx from making payroll, if its board chose Emerisque." 

Well, the board went on to officially choose Emerisque, but that doesn't necessarily mean Wells Fargo has acquiesced. A press release sent out by the company today described the bid as the "best and highest offer we have received," but added: "[W]e will need continuing lender and other stakeholder support to meet the significant challenges of closing this or any alternative transaction."  More details on the Emerisque offer:

Under the terms of the agreement, which is subject to court approval and certain other closing conditions, the buyer [Emerisque] will acquire substantially all of the assets for $70.5 million in cash and a Junior Secured Note with a face value of $15.0 million, subject to adjustment as of the closing date for changes in the company's borrowing base. The buyer has also agreed to assume certain liabilities of Hartmarx estimated to total approximately $33.5 million. 

Hartmarx is seeking approval from the bankruptcy court today to begin the auction process. We should have a better idea of where this is heading after that hearing concludes.

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Progress Illinois' intention is to foster community and to maintain a comfortable and constructive blogging environment. While we encourage and appreciates different points of view, we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.

Discussion on this site is moderated. All comments submitted will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.

We will not publish comments that we consider:

  • off-topic
  • long-winded or containing excessive text from another source
  • inflammatory
  • commercial promotion

Please leave a name or nickname when commenting, as it makes it easier for others to respond directly.