Durbin Says No More Bank Bailouts

Sen. Dick Durbin is justifiably frustrated. After months and months of negotiations with banks, consumer groups, housing advocacy organizations, and lawmakers, his much-needed mortgage bankruptcy reform bill appears headed for another sound defeat in the Senate. Once part of a more sweeping housing bill, Senate Democrats couldn't secure the 60 votes needed to pass a procedural vote. That means it will be stripped from the broader package and voted on separately, where the upper chamber will undoubtedly reject it for the fourth time.

Allowing bankruptcy judges to change payment schedules, lower interest rates, and reduce the principal owed to the current fair market value of a homeowner’s primary residence is not a radical proposal. It's something judges can already do on second properties and family farms. And it would help a lot of homeowners: An estimated 1 million Americans would be able to use bankruptcy under legislation approved by the House. Without it, as Durbin told the AP today, "we'd continue with what we have — more and more people falling into delinquency and foreclosure with no place to turn."

It can't be said that Durbin wasn't willing to negotiate. According to Hill sources, the latest compromise version included strict conditions governing which mortgages would be eligible and a 2014 sunset provision:

Only mortgages entered into before Jan. 1, 2009 would be open to judges to reduce. A mortgage would need to be delinquent for 60 days. A borrower would need to notify the bank of economic difficulty 45 days before filing for bankruptcy. Only mortgages under $729,000 would be eligible.

But that wasn't enough for the mortgage lenders and credit unions, which might be forced to "trim their profits" marginally if the bill became law. The banks lobbied conservative Democrats and Republicans incessantly to block the proposal, prompting an exasperated Durbin to state outright earlier this week that the banks "own" Capitol Hill. Now, the senator is throwing down the gauntlet. If the banks won't help taxpayers keep their homes, he won't dish them any more taxpayer dollars. Roll Call has the story (subscription required):

“This Senator wants to put the banking interests on notice. I am not going to be a party to shoveling billions more in taxpayers’ dollars your way if you won’t lift a finger to help these people who are facing foreclosure across America today,” Durbin said on the chamber floor. [...]

"We have sat down with the American Banking Association, with the community bankers, with major banks in America,” Durbin said. “Only one banking interest, Citigroup, has been supportive of this. Virtually every other banking operation has refused to meet with us, refused to negotiate with us, refused to come up with any kind of compromise.”

After receiving boatloads of federal assistance, this intransigence by the bloated and irresponsible banking industry is truly unbelievable.

Comments

Durbin's intentions are good, but the Administration can circumvent him by using the Federal Reserve. They're already using the Fed to bypass Congress with PPIP, which is the program to loan money to the hedge funds so that they can buy toxic assets from the banks. Most of the financing for PPIP is coming from the Fed and FDIC, because the Administration knows that Congress would not approve the appropriation of nearly $1 trillion more for the bailout.

The main priority for the books search engine is the educational literature - the basis of scientific and technical knowledge

Keep up the good fight Senator Durbin! Banks that are receiving taxpayer bailouts should be returning the favor - by helping people at risk of foreclosure. People do have mortgage loan modification to pursue first. But if mortgage modification is not approved by the lender, then people who are falling behind in their payments should be given a chance to stay in their homes.

I agree with Durbin. Banks should not receive bailouts anymore. Although there are more than 80 banks that have gone bankrupt this year the rescue of these institutions should be stopped. On the other hand, if bad assets are not bought back who will help home owners? That is why the Obama Administration started it's program to help troubled borrowers do Mortgage loan modification in order to save their houses from foreclosure. Mortgage modification is not the only mean to help people as the application is not easy. Loan modification attorneys can help you in the process to a great extent.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Progress Illinois' intention is to foster community and to maintain a comfortable and constructive blogging environment. While we encourage and appreciates different points of view, we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.

Discussion on this site is moderated. All comments submitted will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.

We will not publish comments that we consider:

  • off-topic
  • long-winded or containing excessive text from another source
  • inflammatory
  • commercial promotion

Please leave a name or nickname when commenting, as it makes it easier for others to respond directly.