Our nation is mired in the current economic crisis in part because
corporate America dictated the rules for too long and did so while
fixated on generating the largest profits at whatever cost. These
tactics led to the overextension of credit, job reductions, and the
erosion of the middle class. The corporate greed on Wall Street and
failed policies of the Bush administration have contributed to the
staggering unemployment figures we now face.
Media outlets report on these issues daily and have exposed many of the most flagrant schemes. Yet still Wal-Mart is touted by some in the local press as the potential savior of Chicago communities.
Wal-Mart has long been the leader in establishing business practices that put profits over people. When Americans elected Barack Obama as the 44th President of the United States, the message was clear: The time has come to change the direction of America. Stop allowing our workers and our communities to be exploited so large corporations can grow their bottom line. Now in office, President Obama and his administration are seeking to restore the necessary balance between corporate America and the rest of us.
As the president works towards these ends in Washington, we should follow his lead, especially relating to Wal-Mart.
Throughout the 2008 campaign, Obama repeatedly stated his belief that Wal-Mart should pay a living wage. He understands that in order to strengthen the middle class, we must ensure that workers earn decent wages and receive comprehensive benefits. Indeed, the president recently stated: "You cannot have a strong middle class without a strong labor union."
Walmart, meanwhile, has a long record of suppressing its workers right to organize. Last year, The Wall Street Journal further exposed Wal-Mart's anti-worker culture by reporting that the company directed its managers and supervisors to actively discourage employees from voting for Obama due to his support for the Employee Free Choice Act. If passed by Congress, this piece of legislation will diminish the employer intimidation regularly used to discourage union drives.
In Chicago, Wal-Mart is still trying to call the shots at the expense of our communities and working families. The City Council has previously pushed back against the company's expansion because there are too many negative side-effects -- for workers, public programs, and our neighborhoods -- that accompany their expansion and market saturation. As Wal-Mart continues to look for opportunities in Chicago, aldermen should not be bullied into giving corporate greed free reign. If Wal-Mart wants to enter this market, then they need to step up by offering their workers a living wage and comprehensive health care.
Ron Powell has served as President of United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) Local 881 since 1983. He is also a Vice President on the UFCW International Executive Board; a Vice President of the Illinois State AFL-CIO; and a Trustee for the UFCW Midwest Health Benefits and Pension Funds.







Comments
leo (not verified) on Mon, 03/23/2009 - 15:45
But, but, if they started giving their employees decent wages and benefits, what would they have to compete on with the likes of Jewel and Dominicks? Those bananas are cheap at Walmart because someone's not getting healthcare.
P.S. Laura Washington proves in today's Sun-Times that she's part of the problem and not the solution when it comes to Walmart.
Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 03/25/2009 - 21:56
Why don't you union officials lobby the state for nationwide state healthcare - I mean it seems the only way to get it for people is by having universal healthcare. But your supported-elected President has flip-flopped yet again on universal coverage.
Plus most part time workers in the US do not recieve healthcare coverage where your European counterparts do.
some food for thought
anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 03/26/2009 - 17:57
There are 4-5 owners of Walmart and they are worth about 19 billion apiece.
Your telling me that they can not afford to pay there employees a living wage with benefits.
Your bananas could still be inexpensive.
As for the person writing about healthcare.
Have you written your governor or state rep.
If your a non-union person then organize your work place and contribute (I do) to the union for this cause and others.
My contibution is also helping people like yourself out on these political agendas so if you are non-union get off our coattails and get in our bus. The more on the bus the louder we will be.
Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 04/06/2009 - 09:52
No one is forcing people to work at Walmart. If the wages are not high enough or they do not provide benefits someone wants, like Health Care, they should not work there.
Post new comment
Progress Illinois' intention is to foster community and to maintain a comfortable and constructive blogging environment. While we encourage and appreciates different points of view, we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.
Discussion on this site is moderated. All comments submitted will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.
We will not publish comments that we consider:
Please leave a name or nickname when commenting, as it makes it easier for others to respond directly.