The City (Inadvertently) Makes The Case For TIF Transparency

Today, a Chicago City Council committee finally held a hearing on the ordinance proposed by Alds. Manny Flores (1st Ward) and Scott Waguespack (32nd Ward) aimed at shedding light on Mayor Daley’s Tax Increment Financing (TIF) “piggy bank ". And in a strange turn of events, Planning Department deputy commissioner Bill Eager unintentionally made the case for such transparency.

He appeared before the committee to demonstrate the accessibility of TIF information. But his presentation backfired when he publicly fumbled through his own department’s site, seeking details that were either nonexistent or outdated.

“Let’s go to Goose Island quickly,” Eager said at one point, while looking for information on the notorious Republic Windows TIF -- information that only appeared online after Flores and Waguespack complained about the questionable deal. “Or as quickly as this will allow." When he finally found the desired information, it turned out to be from 2006.

“You said this is current … This is 2009,” balked Finance Committee Chair Ed Burke, who co-led the hearing with Economic, Capital, and Technology Development Chair Ald. Marge Laurino (39th Ward). She tried to throw Eager a lifeline, asking him to move on to a mapping page where taxpayers could find out whether they live in a TIF.  “We took that down,” Eager said after stumbling around some more. “We’ll put that back up.”

The audience, including members of the committee itself, couldn’t help but chuckle when he went on to argue that the city is doing a decent job of keeping citizens informed.

Unfortunately, despite signing onto Flores and Waguespack’s ordinance, Laurino made clear she doesn’t plan to move forward quickly, claiming that the plan would “entail cost and time and [is] something we don’t want to rush into.”

Her contention that publicizing the information would be too burdensome was undercut by EveryBlock co-founder Dan O’Neil’s testimony. He cited dozens of similar projects executed by Everyblock using raw government data provided by the city, including information on building permits and health department inspections. O’Neil personally offered to put the TIF data online in a searchable format within a month’s time -- free of charge -- if they’d just turn over the requisite employment reports, contracts, payment schedules, and other data. “This is less about technology than intent,” he said of the city’s lock-tight grip on TIF details.

Notwithstanding O’Neil’s plea, Laurino deferred a vote on the measure. Her parting words: “We’ve gathered quite a bit of information here today, and I think we have a lot of loose ends to tie up with our law department, and I think we’ve heard some recommendations from other aldermen, so we’re going to hold this.” As Mick Dumke reported, she “offered no timetable for when it would be considered again.” Flores and Waguespack told him they hope to pass “some form of the ordinance” by next month.

It should be noted that not a single alderman, expert, or member of the public testified against the common sense plan. But as Laurino’s final remarks suggested, there are plenty of officials who are making their “recommendations” known behind the scenes, even as they pay lip service to the idea in public. If their intent is to quietly bury this ordinance, Chicago residents -- as well as Flores and Waguespack -- shouldn’t let them get away with it.

UPDATE (3/17): Read O'Neil's account of the hearing, as well as Lawndale activist Valerie Leonard's testimony before the committee.

Image courtesy of the Windy Citizen TIF Map

Comments

It's a good first step in the right direction - if only we can get some more transparency across the board with Chicago govt...

Wonderful article. I wish the Trib or the Bright One would have taken even a sliver of time to do even half the amount of reporting that was done, here.

Keep up the good work, Angela. Daley's sitting on a ticking time bomb that has "TIF" spray-painted on its side.

What would happen if that time bomb exploded?

I would recommend that concerned citizens contact the two Committee Chairs (Ed Burke and Marge Laurino) to demand that the TIF Sunshine Ordinance be put back on the table.

This issue is bigger than this particular ordinance -- though real city-wide TIF disclosure would be extraordinarily revealing. Chicago and Cook County need to get the ball rolling on government transparency via basic data disclosure and this would be an ideal first step.

Also recommend Daniel X. O'Neil's post on the EveryBlock blog describing his testimony before the committee.

Ed Burke, 14th Ward, Finance Committee Chairman
773-471-1414 or 312-744-3380
eburke@cityofchicago.org

Margaret Laurino, 39th Ward, Chairman of the City Council Committee on Economic, Capital and Technology Development
773-736-5594 or 312-744-7242
ward39@cityofchicago.org

Thanks, Angela, for covering this. 

I would also have a couple of other suggestions:
1. Severe limits should be placed on aldermen taking campaign contributions from anyone or any organization benefiting from a proposed or current TIF.
2. Minutes should be taken of decisions made by any TIF task force to encourage aldermen to take into consideration the input of the community.
3. An independent certified urban planner should review the plans and file a public report that details any concerns if the proposal goes against sound urban planning principles.

The residents of Uptown Chicago filed a lawsuit with the City and developer Peter Holsten recently because of their exclusion from the community process (even though Ald. Shiller reported otherwise), lack of transparency, and very poor urban planning...the main entrance to Aldi's placed in the back of the store was the first clue that something was amiss. For more information about this lawsuit, go to www.fixwilsonyard.org

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Progress Illinois' intention is to foster community and to maintain a comfortable and constructive blogging environment. While we encourage and appreciates different points of view, we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.

Discussion on this site is moderated. All comments submitted will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.

We will not publish comments that we consider:

  • off-topic
  • long-winded or containing excessive text from another source
  • inflammatory
  • commercial promotion

Please leave a name or nickname when commenting, as it makes it easier for others to respond directly.