What Is Mayor Daley So Afraid Of?

Although pressure is building on Mayor Daley to release the details of Chicago’s stimulus wish-list, there’s no indication that he plans to disclose the specifics to either the City Council or the public in the near future. When initially pressed on why this public information remained under wraps, he blamed the big bad media. “We did not put that out publicly,” he said, “because once you start putting it out publicly, you know, the newspapers, the media is going to be ripping it apart.”

Yesterday, he played the same unconvincing tune. The Sun-Times has the story:

Mayor Daley said Thursday he’s holding back his wish list of projects Chicago wants to fund with largesse from the federal stimulus package because he’s afraid of raising political expectations.

“If I go out and announce 20, 40, 50 projects, it would be great. Oh, big headlines. Then you turn around and only two of those projects go forward, and you announced them in 40 different communities. I mean, you’ll destroy me overnight. And the public will destroy you,” Daley said.

Of course, the more sensible alternative is to release the city’s top priorities without promising that all projects will be funded. That’s what mayors across the country have done over the past two months. Philadelphia provides a great example:

[Mayor Michael] Nutter is armed with 100 city projects totaling $2.6 billion, saying they have the potential to create nearly 25,000 jobs.

The mayor’s senior aides acknowledge that they do not think a majority of what’s on the list will receive federal funding – but they do think some projects might, as Obama moves to stimulate the economy with a massive infrastructure effort. With Obama considering a stimulus package designed to create 2.5 million jobs by 2011, the Nutter administration’s strategy is to offer up a wide range of local projects, with hope that some will fit into the new president’s priorities.

Also instructive is the case of Boston Mayor Thomas Menino. In December, he disclosed a $190 million wish-list that included programs of “dubious economic benefit,” according to the Boston Herald. After discussions with various public officials, funding for faith-based community initiatives went out the door and in came more infrastructure spending. The result: a program that is slimmer and better targeted. For what it’s worth, Menino even promised to set up a website where Bostonians can track how the city spends its funding.

As with the schools, the police, and his tax increment financing (TIF) system, what Daley fears is public scrutiny. If the stimulus projects were actually chosen on merit, the local press and most citizens would pat him on the back and let the issue rest. But merit isn't always paramount on the fifth floor of City Hall.

Comments

What else do you expect from a petty tyrant like Daley?

Da Mayor just becomes more and more obstinate the older he gets. He is more like his fatrher everyday. Imagine what he will be like if CHicago doesn't get the Olympics. I may take a long vacation. At some point this City Council has to say enough is enough and begin to challenge his hegemony. We are starting lo see signs of that from Bob Fioretti, Pat Dowell and Scott Wags. Hopefully, more of the rookie class will step up and join the chorus. Mixing the metaphors early on a Saturday morning.

Obstinate might be too weak of a word. How about looney?
What is there to hide?

If you need a bridge fixed, or a road (there are too many to choose from) fix them but if you are looney and want it for 2016, the list will be all about the Olympic zone.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Progress Illinois' intention is to foster community and to maintain a comfortable and constructive blogging environment. While we encourage and appreciates different points of view, we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.

Discussion on this site is moderated. All comments submitted will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.

We will not publish comments that we consider:

  • off-topic
  • long-winded or containing excessive text from another source
  • inflammatory
  • commercial promotion

Please leave a name or nickname when commenting, as it makes it easier for others to respond directly.