At a committee hearing last month, Ald. Manny Flores (1st Ward) called out
top Daley administration officials for instituting the “bad public
policy” that allowed the Republic Windows owners to move out of Chicago
after reaping $9.5 million in taxpayer money, despite scant evidence
that the company had lived up to its end of a tax increment financing
(TIF) deal.
Equally infuriating for Flores and fellow Ald. Scott Waguespack (32nd Ward) was the amount of time it took to dig out city documents pertaining to the Goose Island TIF district in question. Fortunately, that frustration has now manifested itself in a new ordinance before the City Council.
As Mick Dumke reported yesterday, the duo has introduced the Chicago’s most wide-reaching “TIF reform measure” to date -- the “TIF Sunshine Amendment” -- which would force the Daley administration to put the following documents online:
All TIF redevelopment agreements, including but not limited to; sub-agreements, amendments, exhibits, sub-exhibits, attachments, executive orders, orders, and related documents, are required to be publicly available in print and on the internet on a website page entitled, “City of Chicago Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Redevelopment Agreements,” or something substantively similar thereto.
Here’s more on what information Flores and Waguespak want disclosed:
- Project budgets and actual spending on TIF projects including financing terms, dates, amounts, recipients and purpose;
- Developer report summaries including weekly payroll, quarterly and annual progress reports -- including job creation stats.
Anyone who’s hunted around for the underlying documents on any given TIF knows how cumbersome the process is. And that lack of transparency and oversight has allowed the mayor to enjoy what’s become a $555 million annual slush fund. Meanwhile, taxpayers are stuck with the tab as new property tax revenue in the city’s 160 TIF districts is diverted to Daley.
Flores and Waguespack are applying just the sort of public pressure it’ll take to expose the mayor’s creative accounting. By putting key financial information online, the media -- and ultimately the public -- would finally get to see how their tax dollars are being spent.
The historical data would also lead to greater knowledge about which types of TIF projects are working and which aren’t. Eventually, that could usher in more substantial reforms to the TIF policy itself. Meanwhile, specifics on future deals, including the Olympic Village TIF district, would have to be released publicly before the Council is asked to voted on them.
As Flores pointed out to Dumke, there’s no excuse for failing to make the information more accessible right away. “The technology clearly exists,” he said. “This shouldn’t be an issue.”
The measure now heads to committee, where aldermen will hold hearings on the proposal. You can read the full ordinance below (click the link in the upper right-hand corner to expand):







Comments
Hugh (not verified) on Thu, 02/12/2009 - 17:12
Hi Angela,
great idea of course but it's not in the proposal yet!
" ... specifics on future deals ... would have to be released publicly before the Council is asked to voted on them."
Josh Kalven on Thu, 02/12/2009 - 17:35
Hugh:
Check Section 2(b) in the ordinance:
"All proposed agreements and supporting documents beginning in March 2009 are required to
be publicly available in print and on the internet prior to Council consideration."
Hugh (not verified) on Fri, 02/13/2009 - 12:20
ok, thanks!
Jeri (not verified) on Sun, 02/15/2009 - 11:25
I voted for waguespack to change the ward and do something big in the last election. He followed through on my hope that he would make major changes. Taking on the Daley slush fund TIFS is great! now we hope the others follow.
Post new comment
Progress Illinois' intention is to foster community and to maintain a comfortable and constructive blogging environment. While we encourage and appreciates different points of view, we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.
Discussion on this site is moderated. All comments submitted will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.
We will not publish comments that we consider:
Please leave a name or nickname when commenting, as it makes it easier for others to respond directly.