While the national spotlight might have shifted to some other Illinois characters during the past month, the Republic Windows workers are still fighting to return their lost jobs to Chicago. Today, they brought a complaint to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) in response to the company's abrupt closure of their Goose Island plant in early December. At a press conference in front of the NLRB's downtown office this morning, United Electrical Local 1110 organizer Leah Fried explained how the owners violated labor law:
The law says that when an employer takes an action that has an impact on workers and union members that the employer must notify and bargain with the union over that action. In this case, [Republic owner] Rich Gillman did not notify union members of his plans to move to machinery and production to [Iowa-based] Echo Windows, nor did he provide the information when directly asked. Rich Gillman did not bargain in good faith with the union regarding the removal of machinery and the shutdown of operations.
As we noted this morning, the workers are asking the NLRB to seek an injunction forcing Gillman to return the machinery to the Chicago plant. Fried further explained that their ultimate goal is to recruit new owners and reopen the factory under "competent management":
We believe strongly that any employer like Rich Gillman who violates their legal obligations to their workers must be held accountable for their actions. Second, we are asking the NLRB to obtain an injunction to return the machinery removed from the factory back to the Goose Island facility. ... This is very important to union members because it increases the ability of the factory to be bought and reopened with honest and competent management.
UE Western Region President Carl Rosen echoed Fried: “We want to see the plant reopen and in order for that to happen there needs to be equipment.”
According to Rosen, Ald. Scott Waguespack (32nd Ward) has taken the lead on finding new owners for the Goose Island factory. We put a call in to Waguespack’s office for details today but are yet to hear back.
There’s no firm timetable on when the NLRB might decide if an investigation, and ultimately an injunction, is warranted. Attorney Laurie Burgess, who is representing the union, acknowledged today that an injunction of this sort requires “extreme and unusual” conditions. She added that these are just such circumstances.
You can read the union's complaint below (click the button in the upper right corner to expand):







Comments
Bridget on Tue, 01/06/2009 - 17:00
I hate to rain on anybody's parade and I certainly hope the UE is successful in getting an injunction against Republic management. But with the current state of the NLRB, I just don't see that happening. It's one bad anti-worker decision after another over there! That said, there are 3 open slots waiting to be filled by President Obama. Maybe that will make a difference!!
Mary MacElveen (not verified) on Wed, 01/07/2009 - 00:13
I am an Internet writer who has been speaking up for Gov. Rod Blagojevich since he came to the aid of the workers at this plant citing that he is innocent until proven guilty as others ran from him. I have written pieces supporting Roland Burris his designee for the senate seat vacated by Pres.-elect Obama.
In my latest piece which can be found at this link: http://www.marymacelveen.com/blog/_archives/2009/1/6/4048212.html...I included the YouTube.com video feed showing him supporting the workers and stating that the state of Illinois would no longer do business with Bank of America. In my opinion, going up against that banking institution may have been the reason for his arrest. The reason I think that is because he was prepared to go to court in support of these workers on the very same day he was arrested. Doesn't that sound suspicous? Also, why does the U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald need three months to indict him?
I wish these workers well and hope they do get some form of compensation.
All the best,
Mary MacElveen!
Post new comment
Progress Illinois' intention is to foster community and to maintain a comfortable and constructive blogging environment. While we encourage and appreciates different points of view, we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.
Discussion on this site is moderated. All comments submitted will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.
We will not publish comments that we consider:
Please leave a name or nickname when commenting, as it makes it easier for others to respond directly.