PI Original Josh Kalven Monday January 26th, 2009, 5:20pm

Durbin's Cramdown Proposal Shelved ... Again

If you've been reading us lately you know we'd been hoping to see Sen. Dick Durbin's foreclosure prevention measure included in the economic recovery package being formulated by Congress.  Last week, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi pledged "[W]e will get it done," though ...

If you've been reading us lately you know we'd been hoping to see Sen. Dick Durbin's foreclosure prevention measure included in the economic recovery package being formulated by Congress.  Last week, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi pledged "[W]e will get it done," though she hinted that the stimulus bill may not be the best vehicle for the measure.  Then the AP reported over the weekend that the proposal has been shelved for the timebeing -- at President Obama's request:

Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., the chief Senate sponsor of the bill, said Obama persuaded him in a White House meeting Friday to remove the bankruptcy proposal from an economic recovery package to ensure it doesn't jeopardize the stimulus bill. But Obama pledged his support for the bankruptcy solution, Durbin said.

Obama said he would work with Durbin to attach the proposal to other "must pass" legislation with the hope that supporters of the overall bill would not vote against it because of the bankruptcy provisions. 

Durbin's bill -- which has provoked fierce opposition from the banking industry ever since he first introduced it last year -- would allow bankruptcy judges to revise the terms of mortgages held by struggling homeowners.  It represents a crucial step towards stemming the foreclosure crisis.  And as Open Left's Chris Bowers writes today, you can't help but get frustrated watching it stall again and again:

It is pretty sad that, even with the Democratic trifecta and even with the collapse of the credibility of the banking industry, that the banking lobby can still delay, and possibly even stop, good legislation like this. They can twist Congressional arms into forking over trillions of dollars on their behalf, all the while twisting those arms to make sure homeowners facing foreclosure get nothing. At least it makes it clear who is actually running the country.

Comments

It's not good legislation. People underwater on their mortgage should and MUST default, or else we do not have justice in the marketplace. Just because a group of criminals (the banksters) got a bailout does not mean that other groups should get bailed out. What it will do is force commodity prices up. More empty homes means lower fuel prices, and lower prices in many other areas as well. Deflation benefits those who saved, bailouts benefit the irresponsible. This is far more dangerous than bailing out the banks because the banks are insolvent and are not lending, thus their bailout money doesnt cost the taxpayer any interest. As long as we have deflation, the added debt costs nothing because interest rates are zero. I'm not arguing for the banker bailouts, I'm just pointing out the fact that those bailouts are not inflationary. A mortgage bailout for insolvent homeowners is HIGHLY inflationary and will be devastating to anyone who has trouble coming up with money to buy food and energy. You think $140 oil was bad last year, imagine what would happen if we had to pay that much now?

We are in Kondratiev Winter, and any attempt to inflate our way out of it will be equivalent to attempting to heat a home from the outside... in the middle of winter.

You guys arguing for this really do not know what you are saying, you really should shut up before you do some very serious harm. We MUST allow the market to freely determine the value of all assets.

Wait till it happens to you.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recent content

Tue
2.9.10
Mon
2.8.10
Sun
2.7.10
Sat
2.6.10
Fri
2.5.10
Thu
2.4.10