Readers Sound Off On Ryan Clemency

President George W. Bush and President-elect Barack Obama both declined to weigh in on the issue, but our readers sure didn’t. As promised, here are a few of the most interesting responses from Tuesday’s query about whether former Gov. George Ryan should be granted clemency. Judging by our reader’s opinions, the 66 percent opposition garnered in the latest Rasmussen poll seems right on.

Yellow Dog Democrat:

Now, justice demands full restitution. And I don't think that anyone can suggest that restitution has been reached after barely more than a year has been served, nor has Ryan offered contrition through his public statements ... which sound to me like the only thing he's sorry about is that he got caught.

Moreover, releasing Ryan BEFORE Scott Fawell -- who plead guilty and cooperated with federal investigators, providing key testimony -- could very well undermine every future public corruption case in Illinois.

Lars Negstad:

As Governor in 2002, George Ryan helped avert a hotel workers strike that would have crippled Chicago. Hotel workers won an immediate raise from $8.83 to $10 an hour (and now make $14.25), as well as massive improvements in health care & pension benefits, and better working conditions. He also shamed the hotel owners into giving workers a holiday on the day they become a U.S. Citizen. Without Governor Ryan's help, we might have won all that, but the cost to the City and State would have been much much higher...

Ellen Beth Gill:

I'm not clear on why someone as privileged as Ryan deserves more compassion than the average incarcerated person. He clearly didn't need to do what he did to eat, cloth or shelter himself or his family. He wasn't undereducated, under privileged or desperate. He was arrogant. I'd imagine there are parents, spouses, siblings in prison who could do some good for their families at home and we're not discussing them here and in the mainstream media. I feel more compassion for those who got caught up in over-politicized mandatory minimums than some sophisticated politician with a team of lawyers who was on the take for campaign donations.

Reader LS (via e-mail):

The man is a death penalty activist's hero. He gave the death row ten and all the Burge torture victims a hearing in the political forum when basically every other politician gave us a big f*** you. So let the old guy die at home, for Christ's sake!

Carl Nyberg:

I don't take pleasure in Ryan's suffering, but his corruption hurt real people, some more directly than others. His corruption undermined confidence in government as an institution to make a difference in people's lives.

If Ryan or his wife get really sick, Obama can commute the sentence at that point. There's no requirement pardons only be issued during lame duck presidencies.

Markg8:

Let the same crooks who financed Ryan's lifestyle take care of his family. I also agree with Yellow Dog Democrat, releasing Ryan before Fawell gets out not only sends an awful message it could cripple future investigations.

Elected officials who betray the public trust are the worst kind of law breakers. We expect the desperate, drug addicted and/or career criminals to do what they do. Politicians have no excuse. If Ryan wanted to live the life of a multimillionaire he should have retired from public life and put his considerable talents to use in the private sector.

Reader TM (via email):

To say the law should bend over backwards for a criminal just because he's elderly and has brought shame and misfortune to his family is beyond the pale. Ryan earned his punishment and deserves it. ... People go to prison for less heinous crimes than Ryan committed, and they never receive a commutation. It's time for this country to stop letting the "executive criminals" off the hook.

SteveL:

I feel worse for someone who sold crack in the 80s that is sitting in jail than someone who betrayed the public trust in committing white collar crimes. I do feel bad for his family, but, he knew that his "failings" would have consequences.

Comments

Clemency for George Ryan is a slap in the face to every person who obeys the law.

How many other crimes did Ryan commit that were not a part of the preceedings for which he was convicted? How many crimes did he commit that were not even investigated?

Allowing Ryan out of prison would be a worse crime than those for which he was convicted. How dare Sen. Dick Durbin consider such a thing.

I am sympathetic for the affects felt by the family of all incarcerated individuals. The point is simple whether their is reason to believe that Ryan's sentence is unduly harsh given his crimes. This should be the only reason for a pardon, other than actual innocence. Ryan engaged in a very large conspiracy to raise cash for his campaigns by authorizing the licensing of unqualified truck drivers. As a direct or indirect result of this conspiracy many lives were lost, more than just the lives of the 6 children. From this perspective there is no way for anyone to justify an pardon for such an individual like George Ryan. Political corruption lead to many deaths, it is the worst of all combinations - corruption and murder. How do we say our feelings of pity for his family, who are not really worthy of our pity because they were neck deep in the corruption, should outweigh George's crimes against all those lost souls?

If I had a dime for every time I heard some politician say that we needed longer prison sentences to "send a message," I'd be a rich man indeed.

What kind of a message does shortening George Ryan's send to the perpetrators of public corruption? Steal everything that's not nailed down, so that you can have a long and successful political career, and that way if you finally do get caught, you'll be so old and famous that people will feel sorry for you and give you a slap on the wrist for your crimes.

I have the deepest respect for Dick Durbin, but the fact that Rod Blagojevich is the only other elected official who agrees with him should give him pause.

The one Ryan protégé that has remained completely silent on this issue is John Shimkus (IL-19). Ryan taught the man everything he knows about fundraising and how to keep it just barely legal. If it was not for four people on Ryan's staff at the time, Shimkus would have never raised enough to win that first election that mistakenly put him in Congress in the first place.

Deb Detmers should also be in jail. She was the smart one. She received immunity and a promotion to deputy chief of staff. It's all good. She did nothing wrong. Only in her mind. Just like Ryan.

ALISON, MPA
Philosophe Forum
Responsible Leadership Serving the Public Trust

'Guess today's events surrounding Blago's arrest will certainly make the case in keeping Ryan behind bars...

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Progress Illinois' intention is to foster community and to maintain a comfortable and constructive blogging environment. While we encourage and appreciates different points of view, we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.

Discussion on this site is moderated. All comments submitted will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.

We will not publish comments that we consider:

  • off-topic
  • long-winded or containing excessive text from another source
  • inflammatory
  • commercial promotion

Please leave a name or nickname when commenting, as it makes it easier for others to respond directly.