If the constitutional convention referendum isn't approved by voters today, it's pretty clear that won't be the last we hear of it. After Lt. Gov Pat Quinn and the Chicago Bar Association filed a lawsuit last month to have the flawed Con-Con ballot language replaced, election officials came up with their own solution, which a judge ultimately approved: they would hand out flyers at all polling places that provided the corrected language and informed voters to disregard the wording on the ballot.
But according to many of the readers at Capitol Fax, numerous polling places failed to provide the flyer to voters. In some cases, it was nowhere to be found. In others, it was taped on the inside of the polling booth. (UPDATE: The Madison County Record, a downstate outlet, reports that there's "widespread non-compliance.")
Meanwhile, the Beachwood Reporter's Steve Rhodes appears to have missed the question entirely:
I almost missed voting on the Con-Con referendum. After I thought I had completed my voting, I wondered where the Con-Con question was. I even thought it was missing. Then I found it at the very beginning of the ballot, right where I was instructed to "Start Voting Here."
It was shaded in blue, though, almost like a space for official use only or instructions. My guess is others will miss it too - and not go back looking for it. [...]Cate Plys writes:
"Bad news, you DID miss the con-con question. I, too, completed the question in blue at the very beginning - but that was just an example. I realized that when I got to the very bottom and found the real Con-Con question, which I almost didn't see. Wonder if they did that on purpose? I checked with the election staff and they confirmed that the blue one was just an example. I checked with them because I was afraid filling out the sample one would ruin the ballot."
That really, really sucks. I really cared about that vote.
Yikes.







Comments
Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 11/04/2008 - 20:44
My suburban Cook County paper ballot (I didn't use the computer) also had the Con-Con question at the very start. Because of the way I was handed the two paper ballots (one was for legislative and administrative candidates and the other was for judicial candidates and local referenda) I apparently started voting in the middle, with the judges.
I ended up asking my wife where the Con-Con question was and she had seen it right away (she apparently started "at the beginning").
I checked David Orr's voterinfonet.com site earlier before voting and my "sample ballot" had the Con-Con question at the end, with the other referenda. A little strange that the sample ballot online showed it at the end but the paper ballot had it in its own column at the beginning. And, to top it off, the wording was incredibly convoluted.
--
Just so you're aware, the Madison County Record is a right-wing propaganda paper funded by the US Chamber of Commerce. When it was founded the publisher was a Chicago GOP activist/campaign manager. It was set up to rail against the courts in Madison County.
Post new comment
Progress Illinois' intention is to foster community and to maintain a comfortable and constructive blogging environment. While we encourage and appreciates different points of view, we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.
Discussion on this site is moderated. All comments submitted will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.
We will not publish comments that we consider:
Please leave a name or nickname when commenting, as it makes it easier for others to respond directly.