Media Ignores EIA Drilling Report

When Josh caught Reps. Peter Roskam and John Shimkus greatly exaggerating the amount of oil available on the Outer Continental Shelf ( a main plank of their VISION Energy Act), I chalked it up as a cynical political maneuver. But maybe I was wrong. Perhaps the Republicans overlooked the Energy Information Agency's assessment because the results never showed up on their TVs.

In an instructive study on the media's coverage of the offshore oil drilling debate, Mark Weisbrot of the Center for Economic and Policy Research explains why so many Americans think offshore oil drilling will lower the nation's fuel prices:

[The study] finds that these broadcasts almost completely ignored data, and conclusions, from the U.S. Department of Energy’s Energy Information Agency (EIA). The EIA finds that the benefits from such drilling would be too small to have a significant effect on the price of oil. There is no legitimate reason for this omission in the media. Just as economic reporting regularly uses data (unemployment, inflation, GDP, trade) from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, or Bureau of Labor Statistics, reporting on energy relies on data from the EIA.

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Progress Illinois' intention is to foster community and to maintain a comfortable and constructive blogging environment. While we encourage and appreciates different points of view, we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.

Discussion on this site is moderated. All comments submitted will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.

We will not publish comments that we consider:

  • off-topic
  • long-winded or containing excessive text from another source
  • inflammatory
  • commercial promotion

Please leave a name or nickname when commenting, as it makes it easier for others to respond directly.